Phantom: The Game of Life, Reivew on Self/less

The whole story concept is roughly like this: copy the consciousness of "A" into the body of "B". What I don't understand is that what replicates to B's body is only A's replicated consciousness, then A is already dead physically, and his consciousness has disappeared. What's the point of replicating his consciousness in the past? What is the benefit to A? Does A just want to keep his thoughts forever? It's not so great, the protagonist just wants to live, I guess he didn't think about it that much. "Sixth Day" can also clone the body, only then does the copy of the consciousness become a complete replicator in mind and body. The concept of this film is not progressing, but it is going backwards. I feel that the story should focus on how the copied consciousness thinks about itself or The question of replication itself may be more interesting. The film's editor wanted to put his own personality into the film, but he failed.

View more about Self/less reviews

Self/less pictures