This film is essentially a couples emotional film.
Although the male and female protagonists seem to be very affectionate, they have cracks in their daily lives and often have differences in work.
Dren can be seen as the representative of all contradictions.
The heroine insists on bringing this thing out and growing it bigger and bigger, which means that there are more and more conflicts between the two people.
Look at the scene where the male protagonist wants to press Dren into the water to drown. The emotional changes, eye projections, and body language of the male and female protagonists are completely the scenes of the most typical marriage film when the conflict between husband and wife breaks out on a small scale. I was very dancing at that moment.
The scene where the heroine was attacked and decided to cut off Dren's tail meant that she finally couldn't bear the conflict and wanted to unilaterally deal with the gap and rift between the two people. But since it is a matter between two people, if one does not communicate or communicate with each other, how can it be handled by wishful thinking? The consequences can be imagined.
And Dren is on the plot of the male and female protagonists respectively, which is the most interesting representative: the contradiction intensifies to a certain extent, which will only make both people suffer greatly.
Was Dren as pitiful as a virgin who had been stripped of her virginity when her tail was cut off? Because the contradiction itself is "innocent". It is artificially created. It does not have its own three views and normal thinking. If it wants to cause harm, it will not consciously choose a party. It will only attack indiscriminately.
If you ask me, AB is obviously the one who gets in the fun, what kind of pain will he have? Then tell me how he felt with his pants on and watching his wife drive away?
In the end, Dren stabbed AB to death. The heroine gave up a normal life after enduring all the pain, or she could not return to a normal life at all. She could only continue to study with her own child willingly and helplessly. This is the formal conflict between husband and wife. The consequences of the explosion and the complete breakdown of the relationship, the psychology and life have deviated from the normal trajectory, but there is no way for him to stop all this, and he can't go back to the past.
Otherwise, do you think that just casually engaging in "incest" and letting the male and female protagonists be fucked can be called "the warning sign of genetic research, the bottom line of scientists' ethics, and the retribution suffered by uncontrolled and unrestrained exploration"?
Come on, it's just a pretense.
I certainly believe that the director is serious about making something very profound, but that doesn't conflict with the fact that what he actually made is a piece of shit.
The last time I watched a movie for less than 30 minutes and I started to regret "why watch this stupid movie" was "ATM".
So when AB took off his pants to Dren, exposed his butt to the camera, and gasped heavily to the audience, who was he trying to fuck?
View more about Splice reviews
