I agree that this version does not portray Anna very comprehensively. First of all, Knightley is slightly less beautiful. Although the dance scene is very beautiful, the effort to make Anna stunning the audience seems to be a little less. The detailed description of Anna's clothes at the beginning also shows that both the director and Knightley want to try to restore Anna's peerless elegance, but helplessly, Knightley's materials are limited. But I have to say that at the beginning of the scene where Anna was on the train, Knightley's eyes were shining, and it was very moving under the veil. The second is the change in Anna's inner world, which did not appear very natural, especially in the second half of Anna's hysteria, which made it difficult for people to sympathize with her. Therefore, neither the external beauty of Anna nor the inner beauty of Anna can be perfectly represented, and the portrayal of Anna is sighing. But in any case, Knightley's acting skills are still relatively strong. The stairs are full of tension and tearful glances. That's not a cover. Compared with the so-called goddess Sophie Marceau, her acting skills are many times better. Did someone actually say that there are no other actresses in the UK, ignorant, Joe White and Knightley have a long-term partnership, who can't find their own people?
Playing the wife of Warrensky, she is only 23 years old this year, but she is already the father of two children, and her wife is a 46-year-old woman. I have seen his life photos, with curly hair and a sigh of stubble, I am not impressed. , I didn't expect that Warrenski's appearance was amazingly handsome, and he was much better than that arrogant Sean Bean.
Not much else to say, good photography, good lighting, good sets and costumes. The kiss scene on the lawn was heart-warming.
View more about Anna Karenina reviews