First of all, let's spit out the hearts of watching the three films:
the proportion of male viewers who watch "White Fox" should have increased significantly, because we are watching the * film.
The audience watching "Jobs" is to see the entrepreneurship classics.
At present, the editor has not guessed the psychology of the audience watching "Magic"...
Then I complained about the reason for the failure of the plan:
The "White Fox" planner thinks that "Painted Skin" and "The Legend of the White Snake" are popular, and all myths with a little eroticism will become popular. Think the audience is watching meat and stunts. With meat and stunts, the audience will buy it so much that the script and acting skills are ignored. So after watching it, the audience will feel that it is very copycat, like a cartoon that deceives children. Coupled with the audience's high-quality impression of mythical films, they will definitely be very disappointed in this copycat (the quality of props can't go up to leaves, wings, etc.).
The "Jobs" plan believes that the audience is loyal to Apple's products and will definitely support Jobs. And people in this money society will also want to know the history of Jobs's fortune and the story of getting rich. But they ignore the most important thing. They make movies and sell stories. The stories are too bad, and the biography is still unavoidable.
I think the planning of "Magic" used to be a car, and I thought it would be easier to sell if it had more functions. 3D, sci-fi, stars. Like electric heated seats, multiple airbags, turbocharged stance. But Brother Ce, don't forget, you are designing a movie, not a car. The core engine of the car is similar, no one is much stronger than the other, but the core of the movie is the story, the performance, the difference is Shichahai, the sea is gone! You're good, I invited a bunch of people who can't act to play a garbage story. People either protect the drama, or the drama protects the people. You are the one who destroys the play, and the play destroys the people. Originally, the editor had just started accepting Brother Huang. The "Partner" worked so hard, and when he won the award, he said that he was so humble. I originally planned to start supporting him, the good guy is so whole, I can't fix it for the editor.
To sum up, the reasons for the failure of the three films can be summarized as follows:
The plan takes the audience as a fool, thinking that the audience will pay if they have enough selling points. To my delight, our audience has improved. Our taste has improved, don't try to fool us, a bad story is bad, I got up and left. If you don't act well, it's not good. I won't watch any of your movies in the future. The "shuffling of the film industry" that I heard about some time ago seems to be coming, and
the filmmakers who can't seem to have to change careers. This is a good thing because this is the evolution of Chinese cinema!
This article is reprinted from "going to the movies" WeChat search public account qukandianying, welcome to follow the exchange
"going to the movies" is a platform for audiences to communicate with filmmakers, you can leave some of your thoughts on movies on it
View more about Jobs reviews
