As a film adaptation of an unknown literary work, this film has a very high sense of existence, not because of the connotation and depth of the film, but because of the heated discussion caused by the "scale" of the work. Speaking of which, don't get me wrong, the "scale" I talk about does not refer to the picture, but to the inferiority of the film. Because it is a bad film, the film critics only focus on the " slots
" (there are almost no highlights in the film), and if you don't like it, don't disturb . A lot, I understand it myself). Dakota Johnson plays Steele, a college student who met Grey through interviews and is cowardly and wise.
The two actors, who are also models, were slightly embarrassed in their performance in the film. On the one hand, the expressiveness is insufficient, and on the other hand, it shows off his body too much, especially the male protagonist's buttocks. The buddies are tired of it.
Slot 2 - The clumsiness of the director's laborious
original work makes the director's adaptation slightly more difficult, but luckily the film version is slightly better than the text version. Even so, it's still a "bad movie" level. The meaning of the work is completely unclear. It does not specifically admit the influence of the male protagonist's childhood trauma on his future life, body and mind, nor does it go deep into how the female protagonist can change the male protagonist's abnormal psychology. Looking really tired.
Slot three - the mentally handicapped plot
is even mentally handicapped than the first, this is my summary. Based on the traditional line of domineering presidents, the plot is lackluster, the male protagonist is simply "lovable by everyone", the female protagonist's anger is like a cloud of the past in front of the male protagonist, and she is very keen to "give her arms", this kind of low IQ The plot design makes the audience unacceptable. The funniest thing is a "little surprise" near the end of the story, which is the "male protagonist's plane crash". The brain-damaged bridge design is challenging the audience's bottom line of IQ? The third movie is about to be released, and the male protagonist will "hang"? The existence of this kind of plot and the director's conception are really bloody.
There are still many flaws in this film, and I really have no interest in listing them one by one.
Write at the end. I believe that "Fifty Shades of Darkness" has the opportunity to win the "Golden Raspberry Award" again, winning the "worst actor and actress", the worst film, the worst screen partner and other "honor".
Director★☆☆☆☆(One star for encouragement)
Actor★☆☆☆☆(No interest in male protagonist's body, female protagonist is poor)
Plot★☆☆☆☆(Not good enough)
Visual effects★☆☆☆☆ (messy, disordered, inexplicable)
sound effects ★★☆☆☆ (good ending, the only bright spot)
I don't recommend watching
detailed reviews + stills first published in "The Journey of Floyd and Helen", thank you
View more about Fifty Shades Darker reviews
