Jiang Fangzhou once interpreted the original novel of "Lolita" as a moral novel. As soon as his opinion came out, it was approved and recognized by some people. Of course, the noncommittal "pedophile" plots presented in the article must be the most powerful basis for judgment.
Seeing the girl who was covered with water droplets from the sprinkler, she was leisurely flipping through the magazine pictorial in the bright sunshine. Humbert thought of his first love—she was the one he fell in love with at the beginning of his youth. The moral boundaries of love in "Lolita" have become even more blurred because of the reasons for Humbert's "pedophile" in the past. Some are like looking for shadows of past lovers.
Irons' performance in "Lolita" made the film more of a sad, poignant, tragic sadness about broken love.
After many years, when Humbert saw Lolita again, she was no longer the girl who followed him wantonly.
Married as a wife, with a pregnant belly and calm eyes, she is no longer the rose Lolita that was full of passion and youth.
Until that moment, he looked at her from head to toe again, but he still had the same idea as before - he wanted to take her away.
And Irons' performance adds to the complexity of this emotion, and the wonderful thing is that if you can immerse yourself in his performance, you'll completely see this movie as a poignant and tragic romance. to look at.
View more about Lolita reviews
