I happened to be reading "Introduction to Psychoanalysis" recently, and I read "Freud's Biography" in high school, so I have a little more understanding of Old Freud's theory objectively, but the teachers who do psychological counseling in colleges talk more about Jung's personality type. I always understand the difference between Lao Fu and Jung's ideas. Lao Fu encourages people to accept themselves and release their suppressed desires (well, he defines everything directly with sexual desire), and people's primitive sexual impulses are natural and Good, people should accept and enjoy it. On the other hand, Jung believed that human beings are malleable and that human personality can be reshaped by proper guidance. Of course, as an engineering student who deals with computer programs all day, even if I have a strong interest in my heart and have been restless, psychology is still a mysterious field for me. The lack of basic knowledge in this field will also cause me to understand. mistake.
In the film, Jung seems to agree with Old Ferrer's "talk therapy". In the first 20 minutes, there are early treatments such as hydrotherapy, electrotherapy and "word association". But what Jung initially disapproved of was Old Fer's interpretation of sexuality. According to the development of the plot, it should be that Jung gradually uncovered his hidden illicit sexual impulses in the treatment of Sabina and Otto, and he was with him. Sabina's two XXOOs made him feel ashamed on the one hand, but he couldn't stop it, so he had the idea of reshaping himself. And Sabina continued to learn in the course of treatment, which also generated a set of theories different from those of Lao Fu and Jung. Jung, Sabina, and Otto all have dual identities in the film, both as psychologists and as patients. I think the reason why the "dangerous method" is dangerous is that "only the injured physician has the motivation to heal." That is to say, you have to be there in order to gain the meaning. When you look at the abyss, the abyss must also look at you.
In the film, Lao Fu was portrayed very well in line with my imagination. He insisted that he was a little paranoid and stingy, while Jung had not grown into the later Jung at all. On the contrary, Otto was very interesting. As for Sabina, I have to say that Keira Knightley's increasingly girly face and flat body make the passionate scenes in the play look like BL (...), and her crazy and not so free acting skills It's not clear when Sabina's illness was cured (or if at all). As a pure layman, I basically understood that Lao Fu suddenly fainted, and I basically understood that he received a hint of Jung's "father-killing", and I don't know how many psychological hints in the film (...), such as Jung's getting old Why did the Fu family eat and eat all the time when they were guests? Another example is why Jung suddenly cried and begged her after XO with Sabina for the second time.
However, after watching the movie, I felt deceived by the posters and publicity. The triangular relationship implied by the poster is not at all what I thought at first. Under the director's handling, the final break between Lao Fu and Jung, and Jung's gradual disapproval of Lao Fu's theory all seem to have little to do with Sabina, but the middle. The inserted Dr. Otto had a greater influence on Jung (of course I didn't watch it carefully enough, it's just a family's words), and the film also deliberately showed some objectivity between Old Fer and Jung. Differences - race, family, rich and poor, it's hard to say that wasn't one of the reasons they parted ways. The Jung in the movie is also quite far from the one who is widely known to create "analytical psychology". This may be because the story takes place too early, and Jung's contributions and achievements are all subtitles at the end of the film. It is shown that in the movie he is just an ordinary psychiatrist who can heal people but cannot heal himself. Judging from the movie, Jung seemed to have doubts and dissatisfaction with Freud's theory when the two first met. Jung said that Freud was stubborn and did not like others to object to his views, or that he was dissatisfied with his own views. The theory is too paranoid and confident. It can be seen that Freud was a little jealous and resentful of Jung's good life (and relying on his rich second-generation wife), and later Freud hid his relationship with Sabine because Jung told him. Na's illicit relationship, and refuses to share her dreams with Jung. If the difference in philosophy is the root cause of the split, these rifts between the two are enough to become the fuse. Later, when Sabina went to Freud to talk about her theory that "sexual repression" was a self-protection mechanism, Old Freud said that she and Sabina were both Jews, while Jung was not (historical blindness does not know what the status of the Jews was at that time). Although I don't quite understand what he meant by "there has never been a disagreement between us" here.
Looking at it as a whole, this movie can be made very well and wonderfully, and the congenital conditions are very sufficient. However, I am not an insider myself, and it is difficult to understand academic and purely theoretical things, and there will be some deviations. Putting aside the academic disputes and the historical facts the film is linked to, the film itself is not very good. Maybe the time is too short, the director is not sure about it, there are a lot of points involved but I don't feel like it is fully explained. Although the soundtrack is not bad, the film editing is not good enough. In terms of roles, the heroine Keira Knightley worked too hard but was also too scary (including the appearance and acting), and the male lead Jung is not like Jung, which makes me always uncertain about the relationship between the two when I watch the movie. Is it true love or just two "mutually treated" mental illnesses (because it is impossible to imagine that such a Sabina is the love of Jung's life...), the roles of Old Fer and Otto are not much, but they are more distinct than the protagonists .
In the end, of course, the movie made me even more curious about this "mysterious" realm.
View more about A Dangerous Method reviews
