Thinking of two questions, Reivew on United 93

The whole play is basically realistic (there is still debate as to whether the flight was shot down by a fighter jet). First, the question of choice. When the passengers confirmed that the hijacker was a terrorist suicide, they united and fought back bravely. They couldn’t help thinking of the words in Chen Sheshi’s family, “If you die now, you will die if you plan to make a big deal. If you wait for death, is it okay to die?” Many times , whether it is brave or reckless really needs to be judged afterwards. If it is just a general hijacking, maybe it is not a wise choice to fight back in the air.
Second, the problem of communication and coordination. Seeing that the highly developed United States still has many problems in emergency response communication among the aviation administration, airlines, and military, I can't help but think that the Chinese dynasty in ten years will be faced with a series of problems. How much can we do in case of emergencies? Will there be those so-called natural disasters, which are not completely natural disasters to some extent. As the old saying goes, it takes a thousand days to raise an army. The daily drills and plans should be targeted, not just decoration or coping. The preparation of the plan should start from actual combat, and use actual combat or drills to continuously correct it, rather than just thinking about it or talking about experience.

View more about United 93 reviews

United 93 pictures