It's Guy Ritchie's taste, and the narrative mode he's good at.
However, I don't know if it's a problem with the version I'm looking at, or if it's intentional! There are two serious logical loopholes in "Human Fury":
1. H - The most handsome bald man, after being held by the inner ghost bullet for a while with a submachine gun, he completed his revenge at the end of the film as if nothing happened.
2. The Asian boy's boss said: Let the man who has been tracked by the FBI for many years stay in the cash truck company and let the painter paint his pictures. As for whether the man who talks to the male protagonist at the end is this boss, I have face blindness and I didn't see it.
The plot of this type of film is very simple, the important thing is to play the narrative. The problem of logical inability to be self-consistent is serious. In the end, the narrative logic of this movie could not be rounded up, at least a small part had to be added to show how the male protagonist came to life again. Also, whether the FBI boss made some kind of deal with him, or the person who ends up walking into the ultimate revenge place is inexplicable.
I still choose to believe the version problem. There is a glimmer of hope. Otherwise, it would be a bit intolerable for Gai Dao to make such a low-level mistake.
In addition, the headquarters of the banknote transportation company is too broken, the door can be broken through with a large card open, and there are no security personnel on duty. This is a bit unreasonable. Maybe the epidemic has made the film companies poor.
View more about Wrath of Man reviews
