Loans were invented by the Americans and then introduced by the Chinese. Then the U.S. economy was in crisis, Americans were scolding loans, and the Chinese were still enthusiastic.
Since you can buy a house, a car, and a computer with a loan, why can’t you buy human organs? So the logic of this movie is just to expand the scope of the loan, and then add the cruel practice of recycling, but it is essentially no different from the bank's repossession of the house.
Suppose someone bought a house, lived for many years and lived happily for a period of time, and then the house was repossessed because he could not repay the loan due to an emergency, and then the family broke down and finally committed suicide.
I'm sure no one would say that banks should be held responsible.
But isn't the logic the same as what is said in the movie?
It's just that you committed suicide because the bank repossessed the house; in the movie, the recycler is sent to kill you.
So we think the bank's approach is reasonable; the movie is vexatious.
Because we can't stand the fiction of one person being killed right in front of our eyes, but we can tolerate the reality of the slow suicide of thousands of people thousands of miles away.
View more about Repo Men reviews
