How to say, many people compare this with Brothers and Brothers. It is indeed a classic that Brothers cannot surpass, but the Pacific Ocean is actually not bad. It is accurate to say that many of the highlights of the U.S. military during World War II actually occurred in the Pacific battlefield. The background of the Company of Brothers is that the European War began in 1944, and it was a year before World War II ended, while the Pacific War began in 1941 and didn't end until the Japanese surrender in World War II, a full three years. From the perspective of character stories, it is generally believed that the Pacific has more characters than the Brotherhood, and the storyline is too fragmented, but the Brotherhood only revolves around one company, and the Pacific War has more people. This is because the time span is too large. Basically, there is no way to start from scratch. hit to the end. As for why not to shoot naval battles, naval battles are more suitable for short-term movies. Starting with Ma Run and these vanguards can better highlight human nature. Although there are more American casualties in the European battlefield in the Brotherhood, Germans treat the United States compared to the Japanese. Humans have a bit of humanity. The United States is more like a third party to the European war. Germany itself has not caused any harm to the United States. Japan is different. Every Yankee goes with the heart of revenge, and the morale is even higher. Finally, comparing the Army and the Marine Corps, it can only be said that Ma Run is indeed a fourth-class person, but their combat effectiveness is also incomparable to the Army. I remember that domestic descriptions of resistance to US aggression and aid to Korea all say that the US Army is not even as good as the Koreans. Changjin Huzhong is right. The First Marine Division has some respect.
View more about The Pacific reviews
