Who is silent?

Marques 2021-12-15 08:01:03

Because the original work is so good, Martin's adaptation basically captures the theme of the original work, and the latter part also gives more explanation and play to some. I was still moved by watching it in the theater, especially depressed and helpless, a kind of suffering in the life of poor people. For them, their longing for faith and God is mainly too poor, they need a sustenance, or how to live.

Melany 2022-03-23 09:02:00

The best of the year, the top three in the old horse's career. It has nothing to do with the differences in the object of belief itself, but about the way people practice their beliefs. Under the packaging of cultural and human conflict, there is the confrontation between formalism and true knowledge and wisdom. It is a believer's seemingly tragic struggle from arrogance to lowliness. His loyalty has never been lost, and doubt is a must. The last shot gives not the answer of religion, but the answer of faith. Time will tell the value of this new classic. →20.4.20 Revisited after three years. Very fittingly, watch it with Dad. There were brief discussions, and even new suspicions, but it all turned into greater glamour in the end. Great. Among the 700+ movies I've watched, this is the most informative (narrow sense) movie in the 2010s, like this tome. Solo/narration: Garfield's large monologue has two functions, one is to prove his sincerity on the basis of getting close to the audience (so he must be vigilant when he ends his self-talk and introduces unfamiliar narration), and the other points to "silence", which is a response to the beginning from the shady scene. It appears to be the implementation of thinking without sound. There are as many as three off-screen narrators, which directly bring about reincarnation and the loss of subjective and objective.