Today the English class teacher said to watch a movie related to literature, and then saw the three musketeers on the screen (do they count as four?), and my desire to complain just swelled...
But, in all fairness , Indeed, as a commercial action (magic?) film, it has everything it should have, and it is worth going to the cinema to support the box office. It's a relief for someone like me who was fooled and scared by the trailer...
But, why is it uncomfortable to watch here and there?
First of all, the actors...I don't care about the rest, but why on earth did you let MR. Darcy play a Frenchman who died for the country? In the end for the hair? why! And let him wear such a ridiculously heavy coat, which made his baby fat and wide forehead stand out all the more! ! And I am a classic shirt control ah ah ah! ! At the beginning, I was fascinated by Mr. Darcy's lightly styled shirt and didn't care about anything else at all! !
Secondly, the costumes... It's really gorgeous and the palace is very good, but with these over-the-top action scenes, the plot setting is inexplicably heavy (actually, I ate too much in the morning and squeezed my stomach, I will tell you you?), looking tired!
Again, the plot...I really want to ask, is this a bedtime story, fairy tale or children's literature written by Mr. Dumas? Does Nima dare to talk a little more? ! ! ! Especially the part where Mila stole the necklace! ! Stealing the sky trap is called a thief, you call it YY! ! ! Does the character dare to talk a little more on Facebook? Even The Adventures of Tintin and War Horse are better than you!
Finally, the title---Pirates of the Caribbean. How many airships can be used as a gimmick for pirates of the caribbean if they are posted on orlando? ! I've watched Pirates of the Caribbean 1 four times, and if I'm in a bad mood, I'm going to take it out and watch it again, but this movie is enough to watch it once, really enough! I thought it was a little weird from the beginning to the end, and finally I remembered it in the last aerial battle---
this film has no feelings.
I don't know if there is the original text written by Alexandre Dumas, but this film does not. (Or I didn't see it? Ask for advice)
In Pirates of the Caribbean, in the grotesque pirates who dress up outside the mainstream, I see their deep-rooted desire for "freedom", not about justice, not about life, not even about God, they fight for freedom.
Even the "Flying Dutchman" who acted as the villain in the second part and the sailors on the ship who were voluntarily enslaved for 100 years in order to survive, can see their yearning for freedom in the third part, especially the octopus brother's sentence: " Are you afraid of getting wet?"
Those people have given their lives to the ocean, so they are free. In contrast, the official battleships are beautifully decorated but helmed by a group of people who defy nature, so they have no protection from Calipaso.
As for this film, the gorgeous decorations and sophisticated pretense have been overwhelming, counting the heads of the audience in a condescending manner and waiting for the ATM to automatically dispense money.
The screenwriter also knows that hiding in the clouds can hide people's eyes and ears, but why is it like this? Nature has sheltered you, why do you have no sense of awe and gratitude? A group of bullies who can even ignore the lack of oxygen and rush to the clouds with swords are really invincible?
Too pretentious.
These three words are probably enough.
Still the same sentence, only wooden ships can never sink, the steel body of the Titanic can't fight the ocean, and these hollows are only left with gorgeous clothing and decoration. ! ! Wearing that kind of shrine clothes and jumping into the water when you have nothing to do to give Nima such a long life, do you think this is really a Resident Evil crisis? ! ! ! ! ! !
Dear Pirates of the Caribbean, you can't compare.
View more about The Three Musketeers reviews
