1. First of all, I am a fan of the original book, because I like novels and movies.
2. Most of the characters' appearances and relationships are in line with the original works, except for the Duke of Buckingham and the King, especially the Duke of Buckingham, which has been changed a lot for the sake of movie effects. Dardania, the cardinal, the captain of the bishop's guard, and Arthurs completely fit the impression of the characters in the novel in my mind. Mileti can be more beautiful and charming, and the queen can also be more beautiful and dignified. Bothers were handsome and wiser, and Aramis would have been better if he were younger. Constance is a young woman in the original book, a girl in the movie, and the character image is the same.
3. The first climax in the novel selected by the movie - getting back the queen's necklace, the framework is the same, and the specific plot is completely adapted. In the original book, the Duke and Queen of Buckingham did have an affair, and the necklace was given by the Queen herself. There will be no warships for movie effects at all. The plot in the original book is much more exciting than the movie. It can be said that this adaptation lacks the essence of the novel, and is completely for the purpose of commercializing the movie.
4. In a short period of time, it is impossible for the movie to describe many characters as comprehensively as the novel. As a Western martial arts novel, you can refer to the comparison between the novel "Eternal Sky and Dragon Slayer" and "The Demon Lord" starring Jet Li. Also, the fighting is good, and it is also in line with the original.
5. At the end, four people joined swords and shouted: Everyone is for me, I am for everyone. Without this picture, it would not be "The Three Musketeers". After waiting for so long, I feel regretful that the front is exciting
. There is also a segment with Mileti...
7 3D effects are ok
View more about The Three Musketeers reviews
