Procrastination but touching, hand-cranked but illusory

Ericka 2022-04-21 09:02:10

A somewhat procrastinated but touching story worthy of four stars thanks to the performance and singing and dancing of Icelandic folk diva Björk. The hand-cranked camera + surreal opera insertion can be understood as a film made by the director after eating grass.
The story itself is simple, of a stubborn mother who keeps her promise and would rather be sentenced to death than tell the truth. The previous description of Bjork's gradual blindness and love of opera, as well as not bowing his head to life and not feeling sorry for himself, is obviously too much. It caused the movie to continue to look procrastinated. Maybe it's the reason why Bjork himself wants to add more songs and dances to the previous plot. If it is for this reason that it cannot be compromised, then the director should appropriately speed up the rhythm of the usual narrative.
In addition, many viewers also mentioned the problem of too many hand-cranked lenses. My personal feeling is that the director wants to restore a real feeling, but it's out of play. why would you said this? Personally, in my opinion, the hand-held lens doesn't give you a real viewing experience, it just has a rough effect. But for narrative effects, his simulation of real effects is not as good as long shots. A very simple truth: imagine that what we see on weekdays is swaying from side to side? Because people have their own Steadicam correction effect. So even though you are jogging, the image you see is still stable. This is not the case with long shots, except that you deliberately close your eyes for a short period of time or take a nap, the image you see in a day is basically a long, stable long shot.
There is also an obvious feature of this film in the editing of the lens. Near, medium and long-range other sudden jumps. That is to say, many times when the plot transitions, the medium shot in one place suddenly jumps to the indoor close-up shot in a certain place. The audience can look a little overwhelmed by causing the narrative to jump out of the way. For most of the first half of the plot, I basically didn't understand what he was trying to say when I watched it for the first time. The camera position is also very strange, jumping behind the character while talking. and so on.

On the whole, this film is still worth watching, and even if you look at the musicals with a different style created by Bjork in the film, you will not waste more than two hours.

View more about Dancer in the Dark reviews

Extended Reading
  • Kristy 2022-03-26 09:01:06

    It's a very difficult movie to evaluate. As a musical, the singing is not wonderful, and the dancing is not wonderful. As a drama, I really don't like this shaky camera method. There are too many things that I don't like, but it is still very attractive. I

  • Ashleigh 2022-03-23 09:01:57

    Deliberately selling miserably, every second felt awkward, and I became more and more convinced that if the old tower tested the upper limit of the movie, Von Trier sometimes tested the lower limit of the movie. This may be overturned in the future. We can't deny the height and depth of some of von Trier's works, but we also have to admit that there are some grotesque and deformed works, just like this film has existed for nearly a fifth of a century, and many people still can't like it .

Dancer in the Dark quotes

  • Selma: You keep readin'.

    Gene Jezkova: So long, farewell auf wiedersehen, adieu, adieu, adieu, to yieu and yieu and yieu.

    Selma: To yieu and yieu. What - what does that mean? Yieu?

    Gene Jezkova: It's your dumb musical.

    Selma: Yieu?

    Gene Jezkova: It's German.

    Selma: Do you think?

  • Gene Jezkova: Why? Why should you - always ask me so - so stupid questions?