Throughout the film, several premises are important:
1. There is no phenomenon of breaking into the door - explaining the internal cause and internal "processing" of the internal problem
2. At the beginning, she was buried in the soil. It is very likely that the first family had discovered something, so she was ready to bury her body, but she was not spared.
3. The death of the girlfriend once again shows that only people who have been close to her know what is going on. Outsiders seem to be like the police and only think that he killed
I feel it should be:
All the people close to her died of unknown reasons, such as: girlfriend.
Secondly, only the old man and his son discovered the reason - the witch, but she was not a witch and was slandered, so everyone who launched a series of revenge and approached her had to die.
But the old man told her, "Let me bear your pain." After the old man was injured one after another, she gradually recovered. When she was about to be completely replaced, her heart was stabbed, and the pain was not finished, and she did not "recover". Completely, so the son also died and everything went back to its original point.
Then the question arises:
What if the old man completely replaced it? Will she survive? Because they have gradually become "living people" from the inside to the outside, when the eyes return to normal, does it mean that "replacement of pain" is about to be completed? And there is no "death" in itself, "death" is only for revenge.
In the end, the same music played, the toes moved, is it simply that the story continues? Or is it that the old man replaced the part that suffered from the pain and she has recovered, such as the hands and feet that were obvious at the beginning, and then to the internal organs, etc., so the toes move because the feet are already healed?
Seriously think about it:
If the corpses in the dissection room can be used by her at will, what happened to the people in the first room before they died? Gunshot wounds are the obvious cause of death, what about invisible ones? Just like at the beginning, the old man explained to his son that there are many causes of death that are not known without careful study, and will only be concluded by external scars.
Personally, I feel that the old man may be resurrected after he is completely replaced. After all, maybe the old man and his son are the only ones who have discovered the cause of death.
The middle son said, "She didn't let us get close to her from the beginning, and all the weird phenomena that happened were after the dissection began. Does she not want to harm others? Everyone is too curious about her and began to dissect her, or it can be understood as Do you have to "hurt" her again to bring about a mortal outcome?
Good movie, don't tell, just guess.
View more about The Autopsy of Jane Doe reviews
