The British confrontation is a confrontation between individual heroism (in fact, it is not) and the system and the system. I felt something was wrong when Jackie Chan went to see the sheriff, and when he actually took out £20,000 like that, I was utterly disappointed. This is a blatant violation of the system. Can you act recklessly if something happens? The death of his daughter gave motivation, and the experience of being a soldier gave him confidence. In fact, Jackie Chan's single-handed fight has also achieved considerable results. Of course, it is precisely because it is effective that more people will be encouraged to follow suit. There is definitely an immediate advantage to rushing. Most of the time, with more ordinary people, we don’t have deep hatred and no martial arts, but we still want to trample on the rules, ignore the existence of the system, and rely on our own “means” to profit. This kind of habit, or inferiority, is what the original title of the novel Chinese man wants to express. The film also reflects the spirit of the original work, and it was finally found that the deletion of Jackie Chan's scenes in the whole film did not affect the plot promotion at all. However, the title of "The Showdown" is not enough. The deeds of individual heroism mostly appeared in the era of pioneering and chaotic systems. Most of those worthy of praise were also accompanied by a spirit of sacrifice. For a big benefit, they could be regarded as heroes. In a civilized society, the system is established little by little, not just in front of the eyes, but work hard for a big good.
View more about The Foreigner reviews
