There are obviously a lot of flaws in this movie, but why are there always so many people who have to help the directors and screenwriters round this setting?
What kind of reincarnation, what kind of underworld...
oh my God! ! !
It doesn't matter if you look at it from the beginning, after boarding the ship, in order to return home to find your son; or from the end, in order to change your destiny and save your son. She can keep reincarnating like this, and it gives me the obvious feeling that intelligence, quotient, no, enough!
Of course, this may be a problem with the description of the screenwriter and director, which caused some misunderstandings in my head as an ordinary person. Sorry, I really can't find those "high" places where this movie can be applauded...
If this film demonstrates the beginning of reincarnation, and removes those factors that represent multiple reincarnations, such as the female corpse on the ship, the necklace in the pipeline, and the pigeons by the lake, then it can also be given four stars based on creativity and setting. Even if there are flaws in logic - for example, the time and location are relatively constant, the "two" female protagonists who are forcibly reincarnated never meet each other. Don't seek fundamental changes, such as fundamentally refusing that group of people to board the boat (with guns), etc., etc... But
now... do
n't care whether the heroine is currently "dead" or "live", if From the ending alone, she came aboard with a lot of memories, and she can continue to reincarnate like this... What is it that is not stupid? !
Simply inexplicable!
To sum up, this film is more than ten streets worse than "Source Code", which is similar in setting.
View more about Triangle reviews
