The first person to write was too weak to observe.
Later iterations, they think there is a problem, they think the problem is on paper, so they interact with the environment. Then some were eliminated.
Then it became, no problem, but to kill everyone else.
The blonde girl didn't forget her heart to participate, so she didn't take all her feet out.
It is very enlightening to see that justice and benevolence are exactly the same as selfishness and evil. Polarization is about annihilating the other at any cost rather than coexisting.
"observant, calm, rational, kind, against violence throughout"
Sharp, calm, rational, kind, and opposed to violence from start to finish.
When Xiao Hei beat Xiao Bai, no one stood by his side, that's right. Positive and negative are reversed in this way. They are each other.
Xiao Zong is just an upgraded version of Xiao Bai, and he wants to exterminate everyone else, but he is not as extreme as Xiao Bai, and his methods are more sophisticated. But there is still no basic kindness.
Xiaojin is an upgraded version of Xiaohei, and Xiaohei is too much on the side, but this is also extreme. Xiao Jin made a just decision quietly. It's also quieter than Xiao Hei, I think it's just rational + lucky more often. It's just that she didn't provoke and anger others to target her, so she survived for a long time.
Then I found that my thoughts were Xiaobai and Xiaozong. First of all, I didn't think there was a problem. This was because when I asked "Any questions?", if I answered, it would violate the "no communication with me" rule. I feel This is a bug that comes with the film, and it is hard to discuss.
I don't think there is a problem, so I think only wins. But it is true that your own victory cannot be higher than the lives of others. This is still clear. That is, other people's right to play games, they can not play this, but they can't deprive them of all game rights.
Is Xiao Jin worthy of admiration? Not necessarily, as the winner, she is only the winner of this game. Her "passivity" won her many chances to survive, and she developed advantages in the later stage: calmly saving people, leaving a way for herself, keeping observation, thinking carefully, etc. ( But finding the problem part is a bit blunt).
The biggest shock and feeling is the exchange between good and evil.
My first reaction on how to prove that I am the best fit (because I think there is no problem, just show), so, chat! People can demonstrate their suitability for this position by engaging in some form of dynamic activity. It doesn't have to be competition (my thinking is very Buddhist), and it is inevitable for the observer to observe the whole process, so it is good to complete the ego for this position from beginning to end. If it were in the real world, I would believe that there are countless opportunities, countless positions, and countless possibilities for everyone, so what is suitable is suitable, and what is not suitable is not suitable, and there is no need to enter into extremely narrow and scarce , in the competition, no matter how it is just a game, life will continue after you get a job, the same is true for getting a high salary, and the same is true for longevity, it does not change the essence of the universe. (Of course this is off-topic, this is not the setting of the movie.) But indeed, I may also encounter times when I need to show myself to match the position, and because every possibility exists, guidance and control are A trick that is bound to be used (because the goal is deterministic) (just open to the result). I will organize everyone to chat, tell, and bring out a personal history to see if it fits the job.
But I'm not "helping" other people to get the job, I just think it's best to find the right person for the job.
But you see, once there is a claim, it will be "one thousand leaks" - why is telling or personal history to prove one's own qualifications? Why do you think there must be a suitable candidate for a job? Why isn't an event or a chance or a chain of coincidences that decides the candidate? Even, why must a "suitable" candidate be found for a position? Hahaha.
Don't spread out~
Just to draw my attention here, I would really -- in a way that doesn't hurt people -- kick everyone out of the game, that's my style of doing things, and I think it works to some extent. But on reflection, observing, relaxing, and letting events happen automatically may be another "effective" method.
View more about Exam reviews
