In the final interview, I will call the interview topic: "Find the topic", so what exactly is the topic to find out is the point that this film has always attracted me. The final answer is a bit tricky. If the question means that there is no question, and the answer is that whoever stays to the end wins, as Mr. Bai said, then although this is very uninspired and clichéd, at least not Feeling like you're laughing out your teeth. I secretly think that the screenwriter of this play is unwilling to use the idea that others have used, and can't think of a better one, so he pulled such an unreliable answer like a brain teaser that elementary school students like to play. "any question?" "no", for God's sake, are you really recruiting a genius, a genius can come up with such a mentally retarded answer, how can he be a genius? . ? ! . The conclusion on the last topic is the biggest mistake of this film in terms of plot and screenwriting, and let me directly classify it from okay to poor.
As for the theme of this film, the director is very ambitious. The main task is to explore human nature, and the secondary task is to achieve various effects such as brain-burning suspense and thriller. As a result, discussing human nature, it's embarrassing to put it in such an interview situation. If you want to have an interview, you should have a good interview. You have to make it so weird and strange. Well, even if it is to show human nature, there are special requirements, but If you're going to be so weird, why don't you replace it with another situation in the first place? Weird for weird's sake, interviewing for interview's sake, isn't this a bit too far-fetched and contrived. Speaking of suspense and thriller, I think it's really suspenseful in terms of atmosphere and filming techniques, but this film actually made the same mistakes as Chinese blockbusters. Get rid of these so-called techniques, so-called performances, so-called gimmicks, and return to the story itself. What a suspenseful thriller?
There are eight people, and their personalities are masked. Almost every film that discusses human nature will have such characters. So what will happen can be expected. It's just "a major event in the world, if it is divided for a long time, it must be united and it must be divided for a long time." The ancient Chinese ancestors spoke clearly thousands of years ago.
Not to mention the performance, men are not handsome and women are not beautiful, the acting skills are not in place, and there is no big name. Uh. . . . Skip it lightly.
From the beginning of the interview, this film made me inevitably think of the battle royale. Compared with the battle royale, this film is obviously weak. You can say that the battle royale is perverted, disgusting and terrifying, but people just tear open the bloody human nature to show you. In contrast, the final interview is quite absurd and comedy, and it is best to have a happy ending: a magic pill to bring a little black classmate back to life, and the autistic boss shakes hands with a blond girl to make a deal. The chief examiner is fierce and vicious in the front, and the back is also gentle and talks like a little sheep. Simply ah. . . What kind of movie is this? Don't you want to make it into a warm comedy where everyone watches and applauds at a family gathering? !
This is also what I can't tolerate the most. Don't work on porcelain without diamonds. No matter how capable you are to tell a big story, and how big a story is to express what a theme, you can’t cook fish in a pot of water if you are given a small dish. Almost there, if the director wants to make this movie a black comedy, then we might as well let a few people die in the middle with a sense of joy and then come to an absurd conclusion at the end, we can also accept it. If it is a suspense thriller, then does the final conclusion give us a similar explanation that makes us feel that we have not been tricked. If it is to discuss human nature, then let's change the situation, this interview. . Not really.
Also, there are too many bugs in the screenwriter. I seriously doubt that this guy has a good record when he wrote it. Many clues given in the front are gone, and the plot seriously lacks continuous logic! ! The most serious case: the multiple wounds on dark's thigh indicate that it is very likely that this is a repeated experiment, but the latter clue is broken, and no one has shown similar clues to prove that this is a repeated experiment, then she What's the explanation for the multiple scars on the thigh? At the beginning, the screenwriter was ambitious and came up with a lot of clues, but unfortunately, it was anticlimactic, and in the end it was all gone.
In short, a film with a gripping beginning, a familiar middle, and a sweaty ending.
View more about Exam reviews
