The title of the film is atmospheric, with all kinds of junk objects blowing in the face, and fragments flying all over the place. I believe that American audiences will have a wonderful effect if they watch it in the theater. The scene of the broken bridge at the beginning is also prudent, more grand than the scenes in the first four parts, and the subsequent gymnastics accident bridge is also reasonable, but the later design is obviously not creative enough, perfunctory, and not as well-crafted as the first few parts. The design and the sense of urgency of racing with death, and the plot lacks ups and downs, and directly enters the final plot after a few murders. The last fight between the two male protagonists turned the idea of the story into a fight between everyone. It’s a pity that the plot design is cliché. Throughout the film, one by one, the characters are dying, but I can’t feel the existence of the god of death. .
The ending is even more showy. Although the connection with the story of the first episode is good, it is already cutting corners in terms of creativity. The most unbearable thing is that the end of the film actually collects the violent death scenes of the first four episodes, which is obviously an admission of the god of death in this episode. The IQ is low, and the classic episodes of the first few episodes are just to comfort the audience.
Judging from the ending plot, it seems that the fifth episode of Death is really coming to an end.
View more about Final Destination 5 reviews
