The American tabloids basically don't know the importance of the drama's historical effort and the importance of setting the scene. Essentially, they don't know anything about Asian history. It's no responsibility to read it sloppily, and oppose it for opposition. (IMDB's score is actually very high.)
Chinese diaosi is also a cause of rebellious psychology, and often opposes it for the sake of opposition. Regardless of the fictional nature of Marco Polo's propositions, they have to criticize from the perspective of official history. This is a history in history. The fictional adventure legend in the background is originally compared with the song of ice and fire, and it is clearly an entertainment product. In fact, no one is a historian, and he has to pretend that he can't rub the sand in his solemn eyes, as if he really came to China from the Department of History of Chosun University and has never seen Hollywood-style entertainment and Chinese transcendence dramas.
The American media can't understand the East, and the Chinese can't understand English. Then Guan Gong and Qin Qiong's battle for a TV series is very funny.
It’s just a matter of trembling with something. It’s just a matter of clicking on it. The big foreigners have worked so hard to make a film that is slightly related to China. It’s okay to do that homework. It is also a NETFLIX paid drama. Those national dicks of "Jin Ping Mei", did you give the money before scolding the street?
View more about Marco Polo reviews
