I know, you guys are doing this again... It can't be said to be a standard bad movie, but it is by no means the kind of movie worthy of recommendation and aftertaste. It can only be called a film that relies on Hollywood's industrial standards and star effect. The production line of the product, after that jump, the whole film turned on the boring mode. From the disaster setting to the story mode, it is extremely cheap. First, the protagonist is given a huge identity (veteran), followed by the hero castration (severely injured and disabled), and then the protagonist is placed in a very powerful The gimmicky environment (Hong Kong skyscrapers), followed by creating difficulties (the protagonist is framed & family crisis), as for the ending, every audience already knows it. Basically, Dwayne Johnson is regarded as Jackie Chan at his peak, but even Jackie Chan at his peak would not dare to play like this (in the end, thanks to the development of CG special effects). And after a little comparison, you will find that these films are actually not as good as "Escape from Heaven" and "Ferris Wheel"; think about it carefully, "Cold War" painstakingly advertised Hong Kong as "the safest city in Asia". A film involving mainland capital was destroyed.
View more about Skyscraper reviews
