Samsung is for the action design and the bridge section, and the rest are slag.
1. The security operation of a building with such strict security measures (has been identified as an air fortress by Johnson) relies entirely on a tablet. How much do you believe in this thing?
2. The boss's authority over the building is not as high as that of a tablet. Isn't this TM funny? This is a comedy, right? Even if Johnson, as the security director, has most of the rights, I am afraid that the highest power still needs to be in the hands of the boss. This boss just believes in a person who he didn't know before?
3. The Hong Kong police watched the show the whole time, the police chief touched his chin the whole time, the police aunt suspected this and the other, but not a single one. Right, is this to show the lower limit of IQ?
4. In addition to being a professional reporter (at least it seems to me as an amateur), does the whole film have any value? In addition, although I know that the fire brigade can't put out the fire in such a high building, at least it can be put out manually, but I don't seem to even see the fire truck. Does this mean that the entire building has been abandoned since the moment it caught fire? Then a group of people stand downstairs to watch the world's largest torch (can apply for Guinness)?
Well, that's all, if you are willing to watch so many slots, then you are definitely a fan of Johnson.
View more about Skyscraper reviews
