Rawls put forward the concept of "veil of ignorance" in his book "The Theory of Justice". How can this society obtain justice only when you stand behind the "veil of ignorance" and are in a "veil of ignorance" to your social situation. Blindness” can achieve the broadest social justice. Because no one knows who will be standing behind when the curtain opens, maybe an African refugee, maybe the world's richest man, but because of "ignorance" no one will risk breaking this rule, it is possible to do so It will completely ruin the last probability that he may enter the upper class in the future. Second, the success rate is really not high, and the risk is very high. The prerequisite for the existence of the "veil of ignorance" is that everyone has the opportunity to appear on the stage, and what role each person will play depends on "creation". But if one day people don't even have the chance to stand behind the curtain, how can they seek justice. It is assumed that in the future, the resources of the earth will be gradually exhausted, but due to the large-scale promotion of genetically modified crops, the reproductive model of human beings has begun to change to multiple births, and this is an irreversible change. As a result, the earth's population continues to expand, and finally it reaches a certain stage where it has to "limit" population growth. That is to say, no matter how many children can be born in one child, only one can survive. For this reason, the earth authorities will also establish a maximum The authority is in charge of this matter, and everything must give way to this work, because at this moment has reached the critical moment of human life and death. If the population is allowed to grow wildly without control, sooner or later the entire human society will be unable to use resources. Satisfy the survival of all people towards self-destruction in the violent conflict. This is the setting for the movie Hunt for Monday. The problem is, we always emphasize equality for all. If such a policy were to be implemented, how would one judge which one should survive and which one should be "frozen" while the children were still babies. Who will act as the supreme judge like "God"? Who can be above all living beings to decide the life and death of a small being with infinite possibilities? What is the standard of judgment? Parents' social achievements? Are your genes good or bad? or something else. Despite the above series of questions, this does not mean that I am questioning the reasonable legality of this policy. Not at all, because if there is such a day, I'm all for such a solution, provided that other solutions have been tried to no avail. Also I don't have the answers to these questions, The film discusses such a future predicament, but the theme is still to defend the universal values we agree with at this stage. The villain claims to make the "excess" children "freeze dormancy", in order to have enough in the future society and human beings. When the ability to solve the conflict of resources, let them "rebirth", but in fact the dormant cabin is an incinerator, after the end of the advertising full of science and technology, the next second of blue high-temperature flames will instantly let them enter the cabin. Looking forward to the future of the child in ashes. Naturally, the villain's approach is anti-human, she's lying, she's an executioner. But people are not fools. In a society with extreme scarcity of resources, how could the government spend so much manpower and material resources to build a dormant cabin to maintain its operation, and maybe technically it has not reached the "frozen age dormancy" at all. level. Since the current social operation is maintained in this way, isn't it the first priority for every living person to obtain basic survival resources? No one knows this all too well, but the vast majority of people still hand over their children under the coercion of the authorities. Do they really think that this is just a separation of life, not death? Don't ask me, I don't know. I don't want to make too many spoilers for the plot, I can only say that the setting of "Huluwa" is really eye-catching, and other things are really too routine. The reason why I moved out of this movie to talk about things is just to think what should we do if we are faced with such a dilemma one day. How should the "humanism" we now uphold and the supremacy of "human rights" be reconciled with the predicament? Even at the current stage, for other animals, man is already a god, but man is not one, but billions of people. If a trade-off is to be made, who can become the god of man again. No one knows this all too well, but the vast majority of people still hand over their children under the coercion of the authorities. Do they really think that this is just a separation of life, not death? Don't ask me, I don't know. I don't want to make too many spoilers for the plot, I can only say that the setting of "Huluwa" is really eye-catching, and other things are really too routine. The reason why I moved out of this movie to talk about things is just to think what should we do if we are faced with such a dilemma one day. How should the "humanism" we now uphold and the supremacy of "human rights" be reconciled with the predicament? Even at the current stage, for other animals, man is already a god, but man is not one, but billions of people. If a trade-off is to be made, who can become the god of man again. No one knows this all too well, but the vast majority of people still hand over their children under the coercion of the authorities. Do they really think that this is just a separation of life, not death? Don't ask me, I don't know. I don't want to make too many spoilers for the plot, I can only say that the setting of "Huluwa" is really eye-catching, and other things are really too routine. The reason why I moved out of this movie to talk about things is just to think what should we do if we are faced with such a dilemma one day. How should the "humanism" we now uphold and the supremacy of "human rights" be reconciled with the predicament? Even at the current stage, for other animals, man is already a god, but man is not one, but billions of people. If a trade-off is to be made, who can become the god of man again.
View more about What Happened to Monday reviews
