That scene at the end of the movie really touched me. The tribe was saved, and Hiccup also woke up. When he lifted the quilt, he showed a strange look, but he still took a step forward. He and Toothless supported each other and moved forward slowly. Although they both lost some and are no longer perfect, but in my opinion this is the most perfect. The director deliberately placed Hiccup's lower body and Toothless's tail in the same shot. In just a few seconds of footage, it is about two individuals who are broken in psychology, life or just physically. Because they meet each other and get to know each other, they eventually become a complete whole. Hiccup is an unacceptable loser. He doesn't fit in with the group, and he doesn't get the approval of his father. People see him as trouble. He needs an opportunity to make him feel the value of existence; Toothless, who has never been seen with his own eyes, Always come and gone without a trace, destroying opponents in an instant, the most ferocious, evil and dangerous creature in legend, but never really understood. When the bound Toothless meets Hiccup with the butcher's knife high, a relationship that relies on belonging and mutual trust, and which ultimately remains resilient despite numerous trials and tribulations, begins. This kind of relationship is something we wait and expect in reality, but it is always difficult to find. Whether it is love or friendship, they face too many desires and temptations in reality and are therefore too fragile. With such a theme, "How to Train Your Dragon" does not need to carry the cruelty of reality like Pixar's works, but only needs to create a dream that belongs to children, but at the same time can make adults feel happy and even moved, then it will succeed. "How to Train Your Dragon" has no cool moments at all. The viewing process is like riding on the most exciting Space Mountain roller coaster in Disney theme parks and spending 90 minutes of absolute entertainment in 3D glasses. This time, DreamWorks boldly gave up the spoof of its own expertise, and a small amount of humor spreads in every corner of the film just right, fully arousing the atmosphere and invigorating the narrative rhythm. The character design is even more lovable, especially Toothless, who looks like a pet cat and dog. Every expression and every action is so cute and naive that the audience can't help laughing and even put it down. Director Dean DeBlois was "dug" from Disney by DreamWorks and once directed the tepid "Stitch". This time Toothless has too many similarities with Stitch, not only in appearance and retractable teeth, but also in a seemingly ferocious but honest and sincere heart. Another success of "How to Train Your Dragon" is the large number of action scenes in the film, the consummate special effects plus 3 The advancement of 3D technology has greatly improved the viewing experience of the film. There is no lack of romance in the thrill of driving a dragon in the film. Compared with last year's "Ice Age 3" and even "Flying House", the 3D technology is definitely a significant improvement. . The last is the precise communication of the theme. Although it is an old-fashioned communication and understanding of love and peace, it does not make people tired. The passage that touched me deeply is when everyone knows Hiccup's secret but still insists on fighting. In an unnecessary and inevitable war, Hiccup, as a tiny individual, was caught between the two camps, unable to stop and change anything. However, DreamWorks, which is good at spoofing, has never been a storytelling Pixar. Although it has made great progress, its flaws are still exposed because it is not covered by spoof gimmicks. First of all, the length of the film is limited due to 3D and film types. Only 90 minutes is not enough to show such a completely empty legendary story. In the end, the opening of the film is too hasty and the ending is handled sloppily. The difference from the previous part is too great. It also affects the shaping of the supporting roles of the film. Throughout the film, there are countless little Viking pirates with various personalities of flying dragons, but in the end, apart from the male protagonists Hiccup and Toothless, there are no other characters that I can deeply remember and love. Recalling the MO in "WALL-E", which has few appearances but makes the audience fall in love with it, this kind of character can't be found in "How to Train Your Dragon". The war between DreamWorks VS Pixar has been fought for more than ten years. Faced with an undefeated opponent in word of mouth, DreamWorks has no choice but to talk about the box office. Now the old "Shrek" stalker hit the fourth has become a dead end. Last year's "Monsters vs Aliens" failed miserably. DreamWorks needs another "Kung Fu Panda" to prove itself. . "How to Train Your Dragon" is indeed brilliantly humorous and endearing to audiences, but it still takes real innovation to compete with formidable rivals. It's a pity that "How to Train Your Dragon" looks brand new, but the inside is always old. As mentioned above, even the most eye-catching protagonist, Toothless, has already been done by the director, and this time it's just repeating himself. Apart from the already desperate money grabbing behavior of "Shrek 4", DreamWorks only has "How to Train Your Dragon" this year that can compete with "Toy Story 3", which Pixar has launched an overwhelming publicity offensive. "How to Train Your Dragon" is definitely worth recommending. At least within 90 minutes, it shocked me visually and emotionally. Finally, I was moved a little inside. For you and me who are too stressed now, this is not a problem. Is it enough. It lacks romance, and the 3D technology is definitely a significant improvement compared to last year's "Ice Age 3" and even "Flying Home". The last is the precise communication of the theme. Although it is an old-fashioned communication and understanding of love and peace, it does not make people tired. The passage that touched me deeply was when everyone knew Hiccup's secret but still insisted on fighting. In an unnecessary and inevitable war, Hiccup, as a tiny individual, was caught between the two camps, unable to stop and change anything. However, DreamWorks, which is good at spoofing, has never been a storytelling Pixar. Although it has made great progress, its flaws are still exposed because it is not covered by spoof gimmicks. First of all, the length of the film is limited due to 3D and film types. Only 90 minutes is not enough to show such a completely empty legendary story. In the end, the opening of the film is too hasty and the ending is handled sloppily. The difference from the previous part is too great. It also affects the shaping of the supporting roles of the film. Throughout the film, there are countless little Viking pirates with various personalities of flying dragons, but in the end, apart from the male protagonists Hiccup and Toothless, there are no other characters that I can deeply remember and love. Recalling the MO in "WALL-E", which has few appearances but makes the audience fall in love with it, this kind of character can't be found in "How to Train Your Dragon". The war between DreamWorks VS Pixar has been fought for more than ten years. Faced with an undefeated opponent in word of mouth, DreamWorks has no choice but to talk about the box office. Now the old "Shrek" stalker hit the fourth has become a dead end. Last year's "Monsters vs Aliens" failed miserably. DreamWorks needs another "Kung Fu Panda" to prove itself. . "How to Train Your Dragon" is indeed brilliantly humorous and endearing to audiences, but it still takes real innovation to compete with formidable rivals. It's a pity that "How to Train Your Dragon" looks brand new, but the inside is always old. As mentioned above, even the most eye-catching protagonist, Toothless, has already been done by the director, and this time it's just repeating himself. Apart from the already desperate money grabbing behavior of "Shrek 4", DreamWorks only has "How to Train Your Dragon" this year that can compete with "Toy Story 3", which Pixar has launched an overwhelming publicity offensive. "How to Train Your Dragon" is definitely worth recommending. At least within 90 minutes, it shocked me visually and emotionally. Finally, I was moved a little inside. For you and me who are too stressed now, this is not a problem. Is it enough. It lacks romance, and the 3D technology is definitely a significant improvement compared to last year's "Ice Age 3" and even "Flying Home". The last is the precise communication of the theme. Although it is an old-fashioned communication and understanding of love and peace, it does not make people tired. The passage that touched me deeply was when everyone knew Hiccup's secret but still insisted on fighting. In an unnecessary and inevitable war, Hiccup, as a tiny individual, was caught between the two camps, unable to stop and change anything. However, DreamWorks, which is good at spoofing, has never been a storytelling Pixar. Although it has made great progress, its flaws are still exposed because it is not covered by spoof gimmicks. First of all, the length of the film is limited due to 3D and film types. Only 90 minutes is not enough to show such a completely empty legendary story. In the end, the opening of the film is too hasty and the ending is handled sloppily. The difference from the previous part is too great. It also affects the shaping of the supporting roles of the film. Throughout the film, there are countless little Viking pirates with various personalities of flying dragons, but in the end, apart from the male protagonists Hiccup and Toothless, there are no other characters that I can deeply remember and love. Recalling the MO in "WALL-E", which has few appearances but makes the audience fall in love with it, this kind of character can't be found in "How to Train Your Dragon". The war between DreamWorks VS Pixar has been fought for more than ten years. Faced with an undefeated opponent in word of mouth, DreamWorks has no choice but to talk about the box office. Now the old "Shrek" stalker hit the fourth has become a dead end. Last year's "Monsters vs Aliens" failed miserably. DreamWorks needs another "Kung Fu Panda" to prove itself. . "How to Train Your Dragon" is indeed brilliantly humorous and endearing to audiences, but it still takes real innovation to compete with formidable rivals. It's a pity that "How to Train Your Dragon" looks brand new, but the inside is always old. As mentioned above, even the most eye-catching protagonist, Toothless, has already been done by the director, and this time it's just repeating himself. Apart from the already desperate money grabbing behavior of "Shrek 4", DreamWorks only has "How to Train Your Dragon" this year that can compete with "Toy Story 3", which Pixar has launched an overwhelming publicity offensive. "How to Train Your Dragon" is definitely worth recommending. At least within 90 minutes, it shocked me visually and emotionally. Finally, I was moved a little inside. For you and me who are too stressed now, this is not a problem. Is it enough. Communicate and understand love and peace without getting bored. The passage that touched me deeply was when everyone knew Hiccup's secret but still insisted on fighting an unnecessary and inevitable war. As a small individual, he was caught between two camps, but he was powerless to stop and change anything. However, DreamWorks, which is good at spoofing, has never been a storytelling Pixar. Although it has made great progress, its flaws are still exposed because it is not covered by spoof gimmicks. First of all, the length of the film is limited due to 3D and film types. Only 90 minutes is not enough to show such a completely empty legendary story. In the end, the opening of the film is too hasty and the ending is handled sloppily. The difference from the previous part is too great. It also affects the shaping of the supporting roles of the film. Throughout the film, there are countless little Viking pirates with various personalities of flying dragons, but in the end, apart from the male protagonists Hiccup and Toothless, there are no other characters that I can deeply remember and love. Recalling the MO in "WALL-E", which has few appearances but makes the audience fall in love with it, this kind of character can't be found in "How to Train Your Dragon". The war between DreamWorks VS Pixar has been fought for more than ten years. Faced with an undefeated opponent in word of mouth, DreamWorks has no choice but to talk about the box office. Now the old "Shrek" stalker hit the fourth has become a dead end. Last year's "Monsters vs Aliens" failed miserably. DreamWorks needs another "Kung Fu Panda" to prove itself. . "How to Train Your Dragon" is indeed brilliantly humorous and endearing to audiences, but it still takes real innovation to compete with formidable rivals. It's a pity that "How to Train Your Dragon" looks brand new, but the inside is always old. As mentioned above, even the most eye-catching protagonist, Toothless, has already been done by the director, and this time it's just repeating himself. Apart from the already desperate money grabbing behavior of "Shrek 4", DreamWorks only has "How to Train Your Dragon" this year that can compete with "Toy Story 3", which Pixar has launched an overwhelming publicity offensive. "How to Train Your Dragon" is definitely worth recommending. At least within 90 minutes, it shocked me visually and emotionally. Finally, I was moved a little inside. For you and me who are too stressed now, this is not a problem. Is it enough. Communicate and understand love and peace without getting bored. The passage that touched me deeply was when everyone knew Hiccup's secret but still insisted on fighting an unnecessary and inevitable war. As a small individual, he was caught between two camps, but he was powerless to stop and change anything. However, DreamWorks, which is good at spoofing, has never been a storytelling Pixar. Although it has made great progress, its flaws are still exposed because it is not covered by spoof gimmicks. First of all, the length of the film is limited due to 3D and film types. Only 90 minutes is not enough to show such a completely empty legendary story. In the end, the opening of the film is too hasty and the ending is handled sloppily. The difference from the previous part is too great. It also affects the shaping of the supporting roles of the film. Throughout the film, there are countless little Viking pirates with various personalities of flying dragons, but in the end, apart from the male protagonists Hiccup and Toothless, there are no other characters that I can deeply remember and love. Recalling the MO in "WALL-E", which has few appearances but makes the audience fall in love with it, this kind of character can't be found in "How to Train Your Dragon". The war between DreamWorks VS Pixar has been fought for more than ten years. Faced with an undefeated opponent in word of mouth, DreamWorks has no choice but to talk about the box office. Now the old "Shrek" stalker hit the fourth has become a dead end. Last year's "Monsters vs Aliens" failed miserably. DreamWorks needs another "Kung Fu Panda" to prove itself. . "How to Train Your Dragon" is indeed brilliantly humorous and endearing to audiences, but it still takes real innovation to compete with formidable rivals. It's a pity that "How to Train Your Dragon" looks brand new, but the inside is always old. As mentioned above, even the most eye-catching protagonist, Toothless, has already been done by the director, and this time it's just repeating himself. Apart from the already desperate money grabbing behavior of "Shrek 4", DreamWorks only has "How to Train Your Dragon" this year that can compete with "Toy Story 3", which Pixar has launched an overwhelming publicity offensive. "How to Train Your Dragon" is definitely worth recommending. At least within 90 minutes, it shocked me visually and emotionally. Finally, I was moved a little inside. For you and me who are too stressed now, this is not a problem. Is it enough. It is Pixar, which can tell stories. Although it has made great progress, its flaws are still exposed because it is not covered by spoof gimmicks. First of all, the length of the film is limited due to 3D and film types. Only 90 minutes is not enough to show such a completely empty legendary story. In the end, the opening of the film is too hasty and the ending is handled sloppily. The difference from the previous part is too great. It also affects the shaping of the supporting roles of the film. Throughout the film, there are countless little Viking pirates with various personalities of flying dragons, but in the end, apart from the male protagonists Hiccup and Toothless, there are no other characters that I can deeply remember and love. Recalling the MO in "WALL-E", which has few appearances but makes the audience fall in love with it, this kind of character can't be found in "How to Train Your Dragon". The war between DreamWorks VS Pixar has been fought for more than ten years. Faced with an undefeated opponent in word of mouth, DreamWorks has no choice but to talk about the box office. Now the old "Shrek" stalker hit the fourth has become a dead end. Last year's "Monsters vs Aliens" failed miserably. DreamWorks needs another "Kung Fu Panda" to prove itself. . "How to Train Your Dragon" is indeed brilliantly humorous and endearing to audiences, but it still takes real innovation to compete with formidable rivals. It's a pity that "How to Train Your Dragon" looks brand new, but the inside is always old. As mentioned above, even the most eye-catching protagonist, Toothless, has already been done by the director, and this time it's just repeating himself. Apart from the already desperate money grabbing behavior of "Shrek 4", DreamWorks only has "How to Train Your Dragon" this year that can compete with "Toy Story 3", which Pixar has launched an overwhelming publicity offensive. "How to Train Your Dragon" is definitely worth recommending. At least within 90 minutes, it shocked me visually and emotionally. Finally, I was moved a little inside. For you and me who are too stressed now, this is not a problem. Is it enough. It is Pixar, which can tell stories. Although it has made great progress, its flaws are still exposed because it is not covered by spoof gimmicks. First of all, the length of the film is limited due to 3D and film types. Only 90 minutes is not enough to show such a completely empty legendary story. In the end, the opening of the film is too hasty and the ending is handled sloppily. The difference from the previous part is too great. It also affects the shaping of the supporting roles of the film. Throughout the film, there are countless little Viking pirates with various personalities of flying dragons, but in the end, apart from the male protagonists Hiccup and Toothless, there are no other characters that I can deeply remember and love. Recalling the MO in "WALL-E", which has few appearances but makes the audience fall in love with it, this kind of character can't be found in "How to Train Your Dragon". The war between DreamWorks VS Pixar has been fought for more than ten years. Faced with an undefeated opponent in word of mouth, DreamWorks has no choice but to talk about the box office. Now the old "Shrek" stalker hit the fourth has become a dead end. Last year's "Monsters vs Aliens" failed miserably. DreamWorks needs another "Kung Fu Panda" to prove itself. . "How to Train Your Dragon" is indeed brilliantly humorous and endearing to audiences, but it still takes real innovation to compete with formidable rivals. It's a pity that "How to Train Your Dragon" looks brand new, but the inside is always old. As mentioned above, even the most eye-catching protagonist, Toothless, has already been done by the director, and this time it's just repeating himself. Apart from the already desperate money grabbing behavior of "Shrek 4", DreamWorks only has "How to Train Your Dragon" this year that can compete with "Toy Story 3", which Pixar has launched an overwhelming publicity offensive. "How to Train Your Dragon" is definitely worth recommending. At least within 90 minutes, it shocked me visually and emotionally. Finally, I was moved a little inside. For you and me who are too stressed now, this is not a problem. Is it enough. , this kind of character can't be found everywhere in "How to Train Your Dragon". The war between DreamWorks VS Pixar has been fought for more than ten years. Faced with an undefeated opponent in word of mouth, DreamWorks has no choice but to talk about the box office. Now the old "Shrek" stalker hit the fourth has become a dead end. Last year's "Monsters vs Aliens" failed miserably. DreamWorks needs another "Kung Fu Panda" to prove itself. . "How to Train Your Dragon" is indeed brilliantly humorous and endearing to audiences, but it still takes real innovation to compete with formidable rivals. It's a pity that "How to Train Your Dragon" looks brand new, but the inside is always old. As mentioned above, even the most eye-catching protagonist, Toothless, has already been done by the director, and this time it's just repeating himself. Apart from the already desperate money grabbing behavior of "Shrek 4", DreamWorks only has "How to Train Your Dragon" this year that can compete with "Toy Story 3", which Pixar has launched an overwhelming publicity offensive. "How to Train Your Dragon" is definitely worth recommending. At least within 90 minutes, it shocked me visually and emotionally. Finally, I was moved a little inside. For you and me who are too stressed now, this is not a problem. Is it enough. , this kind of character can't be found everywhere in "How to Train Your Dragon". The war between DreamWorks VS Pixar has been fought for more than ten years. Faced with an undefeated opponent in word of mouth, DreamWorks has no choice but to talk about the box office. Now the old "Shrek" stalker hit the fourth has become a dead end. Last year's "Monsters vs Aliens" failed miserably. DreamWorks needs another "Kung Fu Panda" to prove itself. . "How to Train Your Dragon" is indeed brilliantly humorous and endearing to audiences, but it still takes real innovation to compete with formidable rivals. It's a pity that "How to Train Your Dragon" looks brand new, but the inside is always old. As mentioned above, even the most eye-catching protagonist, Toothless, has already been done by the director, and this time it's just repeating himself. Apart from the already desperate money grabbing behavior of "Shrek 4", DreamWorks only has "How to Train Your Dragon" this year that can compete with "Toy Story 3", which Pixar has launched an overwhelming publicity offensive. "How to Train Your Dragon" is definitely worth recommending. At least within 90 minutes, it shocked me visually and emotionally. Finally, I was moved a little inside. For you and me who are too stressed now, this is not a problem. Is it enough.
View more about How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World reviews
