Controversy about doctrine. Wrapped in modern thinking, we preconceived and stood in line. Of course, we also firmly believe that the fairness and justice we adhere to are completely correct. The doctrinal debate in the film seems to me to be one-sided, and the discussion of homosexuality and the poor here is rather long-winded. Don't know if these self-evident things are still controversial for some groups, but how to challenge authority, how to persuade the masses, how to reconcile with history, how to make real change, all on the assumption that we have the truth in our hands A long way to go. Mastering the truth, or thinking that mastering the truth is just the beginning of change, takes far more than time. About making mistakes and redemption. This is one of the things that I find amazing about religion, and it's certainly not as simple as just pouring out sins to God and asking for forgiveness. It seems that all believers believe in cause and effect, but of course they only undertake this cause and effect within the scope of voluntary consciousness. Religion is about mercy, and the new Pope said that the more sins, the more welcome religions are. This is the only point that is difficult to agree with. We can only think that the door of redemption in socialist prisons will always be open to you.
About pursuits and beliefs. The conversation between the new pope and the old priest before he became a priest seems to be inexplicable at first glance. It is not so much that he is talking to a priest or God, it is better to say that he is talking to himself again, and at an important fork in his life, he re-examines his inner desires. It's like the old Pope said he can't hear the voice of God, it's more like a denial of self and doubts about his own adherence to the doctrine. What we pursue and believe in has always been our inner self, there has never been a God, and what you hear is always your own voice.
View more about The Two Popes reviews
