Notes-a few questions

1. The last victim, Clive Murray, was killed in a public place. Compared with other homicides that have already been dealt with, the murderer was not cautious enough because he was easy to find and did not have enough time to process the evidence and the scene. What, this greatly increases the risk of committing crimes. The most reasonable explanation for this is that you have to kill. The greatest possibility is that the identity has been exposed. In the movie, Scott analyzed the case and said: Then he drops him for Clark Willian Edwards and as Edwards he stalks Morin. The Chinese subtitles given in my version are: Then the next object he found Clark William Edwards, but He was discovered by Murray at the time, so he didn't succeed. I have poor English skills, but I feel that the translation of the second half sentence is inaccurate. I should approach Murray as Edward. If the translation is as above, it means that Murray becomes the next body of the murderer and is an established goal. Combined with the scene of the crime, I feel that the analysis of the case here is not appropriate. It should be that the murderer’s current identity (either Scott or Edward) was found out, and he could only kill people (we know that the murderer’s current identity is Scott, but the police don’t know it. They inferred that it should be Edward) ). In such an analysis, starting from the life background and social relations of the victim, Murray, there may be a breakthrough in the case, but this is not the direction of investigation in the film.

2. During Scott's case analysis, he gave a timetable for the victim's murder. From this, it can be seen that when a body is worn out, the murderer will look for another target when he is tired of it.

A. Henry Bissonette (the victim found on the construction site) was killed in 2003. His sister only reported the loss of the population two or three weeks ago (a couple of weeks ago). long). The murderer lived with this identity for several months or even a year or so. During this period, the location of the corpse was changed so that the corpse could be found. Why? Even if the victim's identity is no longer used, there is no need to make it discovered, and hiding the body again will increase the risk.

B. The rented house should be rented by Henry or the murderer rented in Henry's name (identified by the landlord, the latter is even worse), and the other victim, Edward, should be killed and hidden in the rented house. Judging from the rental period of the room, the condition of the corpse and the food preservation, the victim Edward was victimized not long ago. The things in the bathtub in the room gave close-ups that lasted for a few seconds. Is this diving equipment? I originally thought there was a major point, but I didn't give any explanation until the end.

C. Henry later revealed two dead men—Edward and Murray. Based on View 1, Murray was excluded from appearing as a substitute for the body. In this way, Edward will likely be the current identity of the murderer. It can be seen from the film that the murderer used Henry and Edward’s credit cards at the same time, occupied Scotta’s job, and each played the role of the triangle? Do you feel a little confused?

3. Mrs. Ash's basement. Completely incomprehensible. Neither the previous article nor the next article will be opened. Judging from the room layout, it is closely related to the murderer, but, what hurts is that it is nothing.

4. How did the murderer escape from the hospital in a short time? Obviously, the murderer did not go to the hospital deliberately. It is impossible to have enough time to prepare, but how can he kill, change his blood, and escape in a short time?

5. This is a problem that can overturn the overall situation. The murderer killed Murray and framed his partner, which is understandable deliberately misleading. But why did he deliberately show that he is in contact with Edward (using his partner to disguise) and is ready to assist the police in the arrest? What if this person is really captured alive? And in the scene of the fight in the apartment, Agent Du Wen dismissed the squatting police officer. This murderer might be unpredictable. If two or three people broke into the apartment, wouldn't he be arrested?

6. Bed scenes. This can be. The two parties in the front have good feelings and Agent Scott's resignation on the grounds of feelings, and then the final act of the murderer. The need for such a large scale can be discussed separately.

7. How did the murderer clean up in terms of DNA identification? Is there a victim who is the identity currently used by the murderer, namely Costa?

8. The focus is on the second and fifth points. Logically, you can do it again, but you shouldn’t read it a second time. It doesn’t matter.

View more about Taking Lives reviews