It was taken by National Geographic! I thought it was the work of the British BBC, but now I have formed my mind set. The first reaction I saw when I saw the documentary was the BBC. First of all, I want to say that, as a liberal arts graduate, many concepts of astronomy, chemistry, mathematics, geography, biology, mechanics, evolution, etc. are covered in the documentary. I understand, but I don't understand it very well, but there is a sentence that impressed me particularly, all theories must eventually return to mathematics, and must be presented by an equation, but unfortunately mathematics has always been my nightmare, so I just learned the magic of it. I think that the emergence of human beings, or the emergence of life is just an accident, it may be a probability of 1 in 100 million, for example, hundreds of millions of galaxies will have life. Therefore, within the scope of human cognition, it is impossible to To find life companions in other galaxies, the premise is to first break through the space and time distances of these hundreds of millions of galaxies. This requires humans to struggle for tens of thousands of years. Second, even if there is life on a planet that is hundreds of millions of galaxies away It must be intelligent life, most likely it is just a primary life similar to paramecia, evolution is also a kind of accident, and we are also evolving, the communication method may always be in a state of unequal and cannot be effectively connected. Of course, there may be miracles, I just hope that I can live longer, and I look forward to the future of the world.
View more about Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey reviews
