Only when the murderer's life is threatened can he truly appreciate the beauty of life, and all other alternative punishments cannot achieve the effect of the death penalty.
Therefore, with regard to innocent cases, the problem may not be the death penalty at all, but the fairness of judicial evidence.
I admire this idea of martyrdom, but it is also a crime. To prevent the occurrence of unjust cases by means of creating unjust cases is the disunity of purpose and means. Whether it is one's own life or the life of others, in peaceful times, dying for the abolition of the death penalty is indeed not the best choice.
Rather than saying that the film reacts more to political inclinations, it reflects more of a legal dilemma. As far as the law itself is concerned, the presumption of guilt and the presumption of innocence have their own advantages, and this issue does not feel resolved in the short term. However, the difference in the focus of individual attention and group attention may be the difference between the laws of the United States and China.
In addition to the contradictions of the law, the relationship between the journalists' morality and professionalism, which is vaguely reflected in the film, is also a major point of interest.
Whether it is law or journalism, the most important thing is the pursuit of truth. But the definition of truth itself is a very interesting thing.
The movie seems to keep telling the audience the truth in reverse, however, the truth itself is so ethereal...
View more about The Life of David Gale reviews
