Putting aside all the hardware issues such as the narrative, shooting skills, and acting skills of the film itself, the values of the film itself are worthy of my star.
This movie contains serious private goods. The movie spared no effort to publicize the so-called efforts and sacrifices made by people who "abolish the death penalty", and even directed and acted a play that faked a suicide case as a homicide case, sacrificing the lives of two people in vain. Don't tell me about the classic paradox that sacrificing two people can save more people. One life is as precious as ten thousand lives. I simply can't accept the word "saved" that the movie repeatedly uses against death row inmates. Why save? Why save? Haven't these people thought that they would be sentenced to death and punished by the law when they murdered and set fire to evil? They still do evil things that are enough to be sentenced to death without hesitation. They don't save themselves, can it be the turn of a group of strangers to cry and rush to "save"? There are so many poor people in this society who don't save, here to give sympathy to some people who hurt other people's precious lives? Every day that a death row murderer lives in the world is a secondary injury to the victims and their families of the deceased. Aren't the victims pitiful? Are the family members poor? Things are all about cause and effect. Why do people who take the initiative to hurt others still demand that others not "hurt" their own lives, and why do a group of people with the heart of the Virgin cheer for these death row inmates?
As for the movie's propaganda, "the predictions that they have caused by doing this prove that there is a problem with the system", which is even more bizarre. If it is a prejudgment caused by someone else's frame, go to this "other", he is the fault. If the judge prejudges, it proves that the judge's ability or character is not good, and the judge will be dealt with. What's the matter with the system from start to finish? Do not pay attention to "whose mistakes are responsible" but pursue "because everyone can make mistakes, so there is a problem with the mechanism of punishing mistakes"? Forgive me completely unable to understand and accept this point of view that seems irrational to me.
Also, I can't understand the heroine crying at the end. In my opinion, these two deceivers who planned a phishing law enforcement against the legal system (only they paid a higher price) finally succeeded in deception, and the parties themselves may even laugh out loud if they see it, I don't understand why the heroine is crying. When a person decides to give up his life, he is doomed to not deserve anyone's sympathy and cry.
View more about The Life of David Gale reviews
