After reading it, I feel like a few pretentious "geniuses" who have done extremely stupid things.
1 During the debate, he said that the death penalty is useless and will not have the effect of reducing the crime rate. He proposed that there are research results to support this point of view, but he later flouted the authoritative research results of experts and professors. The investigation report is bullshit and cannot be passed. A pile of cold data decides a person's life and death.
2 The reason why the death penalty should be abolished has not been introduced in the film. I personally suspect that it may be due to two reasons. First, it is for the consideration of human rights. Humans are creatures of nature, and no one can replace nature to decide life and death; Considering the nullification of the death penalty, the death penalty will not only not reduce the crime rate, but may also increase the severity of crime and increase the crime rate.
3 Then, since the death penalty is to be abolished, I think it is the best way to debate the above two points, whether it is a debate or an opinion propaganda. Then, for the 131 sentenced death row prisoners proposed by the mayor in the debate, one is If they are innocent, they should abolish the death penalty. In other words, the mayor and the others deserve to die. In fact, whether they are innocent or not has nothing to do with the above two views on abolition of the death penalty. Death row prisoners are indeed guilty, but can the execution of the death penalty improve social security? Death row prisoners are indeed guilty, but do national legal institutions have the right to deprive them of the right to life? That's the question to discuss, they're stuck in the logic of each other's debates, and it's hard to be called smart.
4 The most ridiculous point, starting from the logic of the mayor, they tried to find an innocent one, but they did not. In the end, they had to direct and perform a big drama by themselves, which reminded me of the six sons in "Let the Bullets Fly", others say you Two bowls of noodles, if you say you eat one bowl, it is indeed one bowl if you put your intestines aside. You are amazing, you are Zhenlie, and you are trying to make a clean death sentence for the sake of betting. Do you think the mayor will abolish it if he has a letter? It's not that the mayor is not keeping his promises, but that this is not the way to solve the problem, it is an act of anger.
To sum up, it can only be said that it is the stupid behavior of a few people who use their will.
View more about The Life of David Gale reviews
