List one has a point of view: in the setting of the movie, different parallel universes will be generated when the characters make choices after the comet comes, and then a series of plots will unfold between the protagonists in these parallel universes. List one emphasizes that the film uses the behavior of character selection to symbolize the action of "observation" in the quantum field. Every time a choice is made (equivalent to one observation of the quantum field), several parallel universes will be generated. But I think another important point of this setting is that these parallel universes were created after the comet, which means that the history of these universes before the comet was exactly the same, or the same at all. This setting is reasonable, but whether the video belongs to this setting or not, there are bugs. Saying that this setting is more reasonable is only because the bug of this setting is relatively small. If the film is this, then the film is only inconsistent; if not, then the film is not inconsistent, but the whole world view has problems, just like most of the time-travelling theme. Same as movie. It will be discussed separately later. A setting has to be added here: the film simplifies the scope of travel to the protagonist group, assuming that the surrounding neighbors disappear. Otherwise, the incident will be very complicated, and the screenwriter will not be able to write it. This setting is also very important, which will be discussed later. Begin to discuss the first situation, that is, the setting of the film is exactly as stated in the list, then the film is inconsistent. Under this setting, the generation of the parallel world will only happen after the first choice made by the protagonist group after arriving at the party house, and everything is normal before that. But there is a detail at the end of the film. The heroine A puts on B's clothes after stunned another herself in the car, which shows that they have had differences (wearing different clothes) before they came to the party. This is inconsistency. (The reason for adding this detail may be to emphasize the difference between the heroines of the two parallel universes, which is superfluous.) In the second case, the film is not set in this way, but the parallel universe has always existed, and the coming of the comet just opened The passages between the parallel universes, and the parallel universes have been different before the passage is opened (from the different clothes of the heroine above before the party). This setting has a big bug, and it is also the bug of most time-travel works. Let me tell you. The bug is that many movies and many viewers think that parallel universes are different, but take it for granted that another parallel universe will have another self. This is very problematic. If each universe is different, then the probability of you in another universe is infinitely close to zero, and there may be another you in ten million parallel universes. For example, if Universe A and Universe B initially had only one small meteorite The fragment was in a different position, a day later it hit another fragment, and now two fragments are in different positions; a day later, the two fragments each affect the other fragment. . . . . . Butterfly effect, domino effect, whatever you want to say, in a word, a small difference will cause a huge difference between the two universes in the near future, not to mention the high probability that the two universes are not small differences from the beginning. And most likely it didn't go through a short period of time? In countless parallel universes, there may be two with galaxies, and in countless universes with galaxies, there may be one or two with solar systems, and then the earth. How many of the countless parallel universes with Earth will evolve animals? Humanity? Ok, finally you have found two people who shared the human species in countless parallel universes, but a Homo sapiens in universe A fell to his death, and the Homo sapiens in universe B did not fall to his death, a hundred years later This small difference has led to the vast difference between the two universes. To put it closer, if Hitler died prematurely, or broke his brain as a child, the world would be different today, maybe there would be World War II, but it would definitely not be the same day, and the world today probably wouldn't be either. There you are. And every parallel universe in the film has this group of people, and they all come to the party. This probability is several orders of magnitude lower than the probability that you will become immortal in the next second. Therefore, the second situation is even more unreasonable, and it can only be that the setting of the first list is correct. There are still many problems in the film, and it is impossible to delve into them all. Maybe it's not appropriate to put it on the line like this. After all, it is very commendable for a low-cost movie to be made like this, and it is better than many sci-fi films of the same type. But it can't be called a masterpiece, so is "The Man From Earth". The only real masterpieces that I can think of at this moment are "Interstellar" and "Three-Body Problem" (maybe I have read too few movies and books), it's not that these two works have no problems, but that there are problems and it's not like me Simple logic problems that laymen can see. How many of them will evolve into animals? Humanity? Ok, finally you have found two people who shared the human species in countless parallel universes, but a Homo sapiens in universe A fell to his death, and the Homo sapiens in universe B did not fall to his death, a hundred years later This small difference has led to the vast difference between the two universes. To put it closer, if Hitler died prematurely, or broke his brain as a child, the world would be different today, maybe there would be World War II, but it would definitely not be the same day, and the world today probably wouldn't be either. There you are. And every parallel universe in the film has this group of people, and they all come to the party. This probability is several orders of magnitude lower than the probability that you will become immortal in the next second. Therefore, the second situation is even more unreasonable, and it can only be that the setting of the first list is correct. There are still many problems in the film, and it is impossible to delve into them all. Maybe it's not appropriate to put it on the line like this. After all, it is very commendable for a low-cost movie to be made like this, and it is better than many sci-fi films of the same type. But it can't be called a masterpiece, so is "The Man From Earth". The only real masterpieces that I can think of at this moment are "Interstellar" and "Three-Body Problem" (maybe I have read too few movies and books), it's not that these two works have no problems, but that there are problems and it's not like me Simple logic problems that laymen can see. How many of them will evolve into animals? Humanity? Ok, finally you have found two people who shared the human species in countless parallel universes, but a Homo sapiens in universe A fell to his death, and the Homo sapiens in universe B did not fall to his death, a hundred years later This small difference has led to the vast difference between the two universes. To put it closer, if Hitler died prematurely, or broke his brain as a child, the world would be different today, maybe there would be World War II, but it would definitely not be the same day, and the world today probably wouldn't be either. There you are. And every parallel universe in the film has this group of people, and they all come to the party. This probability is several orders of magnitude lower than the probability that you will become immortal in the next second. Therefore, the second situation is even more unreasonable, and it can only be that the setting of the first list is correct. There are still many problems in the film, and it is impossible to delve into them all. Maybe it's not appropriate to put it on the line like this. After all, it is very commendable for a low-cost movie to be made like this, and it is better than many sci-fi films of the same type. But it can't be called a masterpiece, so is "The Man From Earth". The only real masterpieces that I can think of at this moment are "Interstellar" and "Three-Body Problem" (maybe I have read too few movies and books), it's not that these two works have no problems, but that there are problems and it's not like me Simple logic problems that laymen can see.
View more about Coherence reviews
