In the movie starring Paul Walker, what happened in a short night has a very tight plot. From the happening to the end, too many things happened. A gun triggers not only the underworld trade, but also the dark status quo of American society. There are domestic violence, conflicts between pimps and prostitutes, and pedophilia men and women. What has recently been triggered is the rage of gangsters. From Paul’s mouth, he kept making fucking sounds, and I can think that this gun brought him so much trouble. At the beginning of the movie, why did he not dispose of the gun? I think many people have this kind of thinking, maybe no one thinks more in the process of the intense plot, nor did they think that the ending will be able to give an answer. I have to say that Paul is really suitable for acting as an undercover agent. He looks like a good person. He is fooling around in the gang. The first impression he gives is not a heinous bastard. Keeping guns is also to keep the case and evidence.
It is indeed too dangerous for children to use guns. Children cannot correctly judge under what circumstances they use guns. They are not even able to follow the understanding of ordinary people like bad people. Sometimes ordinary people think that things are not serious enough to use guns. Solving, but it is unacceptable in the child's eyes. The child may only think of using a gun to solve the problem. This is also a simple right and wrong in the child's eyes.
The place at the end is indeed harmonious, and this also needs to bring hope to the children. After all, the father is not a bad person but a policeman, and in the end he did not sacrifice but suspended animation.
View more about
Running Scared reviews
