The overall structure is simple and conforms to the basic rules of the Trinity Rate, but even if such a simple structure is unfolded in nearly three hours, it does not make people feel procrastination and boredom at all.
Naturally, Shakespeare's classic stories are familiar to everyone, but it is undeniable that classics are classics. The stories of human nature and the cruelty of fate that were penetrated hundreds of years ago are always worth thinking about.
And this film is not a copycat of Shakespeare.
Akira Kurosawa's reinvention has made it a completely Japanese work. Whether it is the background of the story, the characters, or the structure of the plot, it is a completely Japanese work.
One of the details I like very much is that Kuang Ami asked the sky after the death of the old master and the third son, why are you so ruthless, playing with the world at will, and causing people to suffer such pain. Just like the saying "Heaven and earth are not benevolent, and all things are dogs." This sentence made me think, right, fate is so cruel.
Then Kuang Ami was refuted, and the person who refuted him said that human beings killed each other, and the sky no longer knew how to help us.
Yes, is this a cruel fate, or is it that human beings do not know how to cherish it? Tragedy in the end to educate us or is it all just a disorderly arrangement of fate?
View more about Ran reviews
