It is known as a classic, but after watching it, it feels too fictitious. It feels like I want to make a movie and an opera, but it turns out to be nothing. Why do so many people say it looks good, do you really watch it carefully and then think it looks good? Just look at the posters or the tidbits, and then people say good-looking or not really good-looking, the story is not novel, isn't it just a monster and a relatively clean young man fighting for an ignorant woman, and then the monster loses? Movies with the same theme can't compare
. The fight between two men is too unmanly, and the woman who has been fought has no subjective mentality description at all. If it is put in real life, it is estimated that it will be called a slut. In many places, the director did not explain it clearly, such as: Why is that monster so hard to catch, isn't it a theater? King Kong has been caught. Don't say that King Kong has a bigger target, the one in "The Phantom of Louvre" is really a phantom, and a ghost has also been found. , and the place where he lives is too big, still underground, sloppy king, are you!? Did he run away or die in the end? What happened. The mask is a ninja? I almost fell asleep after watching the whole film. I couldn’t help but fast forward. The story is rough, maybe the original book is better, but I haven’t seen it, so I can’t comment. The music of the film is average, maybe because it is Weber composed the music, so it has a certain celebrity effect, but it sings well, it can be said that the cabbage is cooked to the taste of meat. But all the cover versions I have heard before are a little better than the original sound. In short, this film It can't be regarded as beautiful, and the music can't be regarded as very good. Of course, I may have poor taste, so subjectively speaking, it can only be regarded as slightly better than other movies of the same type (except cartoons), and that's it.
View more about
The Phantom of the Opera reviews