The Nymphomaniac
Chinese translation of "Female Addicts", there are two parts.
The film director is the Danish madman Lars von Trier (Lars von Trier), perhaps more familiar to everyone is "Dog Town". This is a director whose works can never get rid of the "controversial" label, a director who loves everything equal to haters hate. He likes to explore human nature and pay attention to special groups of people. Then the biggest controversy of "Female Addict" is that it is exaggerated to the scale of an A movie. One comment is "I found a bunch of big stars to make an A movie", and the second part is even more physiologically uncomfortable. The scene caused a lot of scolding when the director's cut version of the Venice Film Festival was released.
Most of the films that were initially attracted were because of Stacy Martin's exquisite appearance - the fairy model who once caused crazy reposts on Weibo, such a graceful The attractiveness of Keren's "A-film performance" is fatal. Not to mention the Cannes actress Charlotte Gainsbourg (Charlotte Gainsbourg) and the Transformers actor Shia La Beouf (Shia La Beouf) are also "stunning" performances - although the director has stated all the truth more than once Sex scenes (especially close-ups of organs) are the product of facial expressions made by actors and the combination of real guns and live ammunition of porn stars, but in any case, in almost all movie recommendations, there is never a shortage of "Female Addict"" Super Scale" description.
As a result, many negative comments on the film revolved around "absurd works that rely on grandstanding on a huge scale". Some of the plots of the film can be described in such dispassionate and accurate language as "the heroine got wet on the hospital bed after her father died in the hospital, and the body fluids flowed down her thighs" - this sentence sums up the plot right. For most people, it will cause psychological discomfort, but I think this is a very warm film, with abundant and complex emotions, so that all the plots that are really absurd and out of common sense should be described emotionally. Although this film has a plot story that can be described as "hunting for curiosity", including picture processing, it is fundamentally different from a film that is labeled as "hunting for wonder" or even the ultimate goal is for finding wonder.
Fantastic films are fundamentally challenging people’s cognition and psychological bottom line, impacting your three-view and your eyeballs, but this Danish lunatic is a capable and ambitious filmmaker, and he is willing to explore and discuss” The psychology behind the "absurd", and express the life of these marginal characters with heart. "Women's Addict" is a way to show the weight of a five-hour director's cut, after shedding its over-the-top garb—whether it's necessary or not is another issue.
The title of the film The Nymphomaniac, translated as female addict is actually not very accurate. The common expression of sex addict is sex addict, but it is difficult to find an accurate Chinese translation for nymphomaniac. The more common ones are "female addicts" and "female sex addicts". ", there is indeed a difference between the two. I personally think that the main difference is that sex addiction is a need and pornography is a desire, but when a desire can be called a disease and is dominated by desire, it is not far from addiction. how much. However, these two words are fundamentally different in characterizing the heroine, just like the retort when the heroine is called "addiction" - "I am not a need, but a desire." Therefore, in many behaviors In fact, she is not passive like a sex addict, she is active - but the initiative to comply with desire is also a passive to be dominated by desire. Joe, the heroine in the movie, isn't actually a typical sex addict, she's more of a fanatical extreme rebel in many things.
There is a two-minute shady scene at the beginning of the movie, and a director who has no bad taste is not good at directing this kind of subject. Then the explosive metal music sounded, which was out of tune with the quiet winter night alley. An old male scholar went out to buy cakes, showing a feeling of twilight 007, and then the sound came abruptly when a woman lying on the ground covered in bruises was found. end.
The story begins with the real timeline. The old scholar sligeman (for the convenience of understanding, he will be referred to as a single old man in the following text) kindly picks up the heroine Joe, who is lying on the street with bruises and bruises. This happens in the real timeline until the end of the film. A minute ago, both sides were chatting.
The single old man asked Joe why this happened, and Joe said that you must not understand, and the old man said he could try it. Joe said, 'That's going to be the first long story, and I don't even know where to start. So as she saw the objects in the old man's room, the story of this woman became another memory timeline, interspersed with the real timeline of the film, presenting us the sexual history of a female addict.
The story starts with a fish hook - the screenwriter and director have ingeniously connected these items with Joe's story, including the use of camera language. I won't go into details for the reasons of space, and there are many professional online professionals. Dana has analyzed it very well - Joe said that he is only a toddler, and already has a great interest in his own sexual organs, and even at the age of six, she has followed her best friend B to waterproof the bathroom at home, and she lifted her skirt and lay down on her way to school. Frog, experiencing the strange feeling of the ground current and the collision between the legs. Joe thinks it's a sin, but the old man thinks it's not, "The fetus will also be interested in its own organs, is the fetus also guilty?" Joe said that you just don't know what happened later. Some details interspersed can also see that Joe's family is not happy, and she said to the old man, "Maybe the only difference between me and others is that I always hope to ask for more from the sunset. Moment, I always want to see more brilliant colors, this may be my only sin", watch the whole film, everyone who reads this sentence should be different, put it on hold for now.
This can be said to be the origin of everything - premature awakening. Joe's father is a doctor, so the young Joe took his father's medical book and looked at the body structure of women, focusing on words such as pudendal nerves. The father heard it, but perhaps it was just his daughter's desire for knowledge - but buried in Joe's heart was another desire.
The story is not complete. We can't know exactly why Joe started to fall into the arms of sex from the fragmented memories given by the film. The premature awakening was the fuse, but what made her character, she was bewitched. Or stimulation, or just an innate physiological need - we don't know. Joe didn't tell us what the catalyst was, she went to a guy named Jay who repaired motorcycles, thinking that he would have seen the world in car repairs, so she asked him to help her get rid of her virginity. The huge 3+5 numbers appeared on the screen, the first three and the last five, totaling eight, was the "pain" she remembered her whole life, and she said that she would never have sex again.
But it was just a very ritualistic affair for a man who ended up being called nymphomaniac, and getting rid of virginity seemed to open the door for Joe. So you can see Joe later betting on a bag of chocolate candy with his best friend B, playing the game of "whoever has more sex with the man on the train wins", wearing a whore suit that means "f**k me" , with eyes and smiles to tempt men to go to the toilets of the train to have fun. In the end, the female protagonist managed to get the bag of chocolate candies by getting an elite married man who B couldn't handle - although the man rushed home because his sperm was in good condition and his wife was ovulating and could conceive a child.
In fact, this is one of the most impressive chapters in the first book. It's all complicated yet natural here, and while it's clearly a turning point, Joe is finally getting into a state of getting pleasure from what we think of as "chaotic sex," which, if compared to drug addicts, might be the real attempt The moment of drug use, and the last bag of candy may be like the first time a drug addict has a pleasurable hallucination because of the drug. Although her best friend B's inducement to her was indispensable, Joe, who recalled it, still said to the old man with an incredible expression, "It's true, just a look and a smile". B's skills are more mature than her, but she managed it. The man who B can't handle. She herself believes that she has a talent for this.
From this beginning, the next chapter, from the story to the picture, is startling. Joe wants to have sex with different men, and she tells every man she's done that it's her first orgasm, some are grateful for it, and some say "every woman says so", Joe In this state, it is very natural, and she feels happy to be free from different men's bodies. What she enjoys here may not only be physical pleasure, but also marijuana that is indispensable to her spirit. She enjoys these behaviors as The self-absorbed orgasm that I brought—but not the feelings for a specific man. She and her best friend B formed a club with the theme of "vagina first, sex first", and the way a few girls in the club read slogans against the white wall and black letters was a bit cult-like. They rebelled against love, made a rule that they would never have sex with the same man for the second time, and went to break the couple's merchandise window in the store, until the "most determined" who had talked on stage about how he teased male college students. "B had sex with the same boy for the third time and it all suddenly fell apart. B confronted Joe, questioned her for not knowing what sex was all about, and left the only line in the movie that appears twice—
This section is particularly interesting. Joe's behavior, including refusing love - there is a section of Joe's views on love and sex in the film, as shown below - saying that she is the first orgasm after sex, etc., it can be seen that she is not a purely symbolic sex Addict, she wants to control what she wants to resist. She wants a life outside the rules, and wants to do what she approves of. No matter what the public thinks, sex is her gate, her weapon and method. Years later, Joe told the old man in bed that she wanted to hurt others to satisfy herself. She knew she was wrong, but was it wrong? What did she hurt and what did she break? Many people have raised a viewpoint on feminism from this, thinking that the director uses this to express feminism, and expresses the dissatisfaction of the current patriarchal society with Joe's desire to pursue his own without hurting anyone but under great pressure. Thousands of people and thousands of Hamlets, this interpretation is also an entry point, and I personally disagree. With Joe's very insistent notions, it's hard to say whether it's the precocious arousal that gave her a tendency to defy the rules, or whether it's her innate character that catalyzes the precocious arousal into nymphomaniac -- we don't even say no Clear whether her thirst for sex stems from her physiology or her sense of accomplishment after fighting the rules.
She is contradictory. She wants to have sex with people—even turning her house into a free sex exchange room. Too many sex friends make her unable to arrange schedules, and many of these sex friends know that some of them are willing to wait for some gentlemen Lined up, they and her enjoyed sexual pleasure and satisfaction in their own bodies, and perhaps all the men were no different from her in this regard. But while she enjoys the sensory stimulation of sex first, the club that announces the slogan is underground. She still realizes that her behavior is outside the rules of this society, and even if it does not cause harm, it is for the society Unacceptable - As for whether it is the inequality brought to her by the patriarchal society, I think it still has an impact. If Joe is a man, maybe this is the capital of showing off. It may also be based on this that they need the existence of this club, and they acquit themselves of their guilt. She resisted love, even looked down on it, turned her face because B was in love, and sneered at couples in the movie theater. Let's not talk about the significance of this resistance, but when she happened to meet the "top three and last five" again because of a chance to find a job When she changed her name to Jerome's Jay (male protagonist), she changed. Jerome is his boss (just in place of his uncle) and Joe is his secretary. Jerome was excited when she saw Joe and wanted to kiss, but Joe refused. She kept her rule of "don't go to bed with a man for the second time" in her heart, but in the end, she paid a little bit of attention to Jerome at work. Sinking, at the beginning of love, she still slept with many men, but as her irresistible love deepened, she even had no sex for several days. By the time she decides to send the letter, Jerome has already found a new love. Sadly, she covered herself in her coat on the train and started masturbating in the presence of people around her, collaging the similarities between the men in the train and Jerome.
Sex took on a whole new meaning for Joe - to vent. Her feelings have become a little numb because of the flood of sex, and her resistance to the rules has eroded her empathy. The rules and emotions of society are obstacles to her. The feelings of the explosion can only be vented in the most familiar way to cover up the emotions of the explosion. If the previous Joe was still a rebellious woman who controlled his desires, then after that, Joe began to go out of control.
All the previous plots and discussions are based on the premise that Joe's behavior did not cause substantial harm to anyone. Although she broke the consensus and rules that have been formed in this society for a long time, sex with many men is also voluntary by all men. Friends even know that she has sex with countless men. On this basis, it can be said that Joe is pursuing his own desires. It is only because of society's conservative prejudice against women that her "rebelliousness" is caused. It is reasonable to talk about women's rights. But I think the director may have just mentioned this rather than the main point, because then, Joe starts to get into a moral dilemma. Joe treats these men with ruthlessness, although it can be said that the man who has affection for her is wishful thinking, but in order to be able to come and go freely in these intricate connections, Joe has also been lying. Her response to the man was also cast by dice, everything was random. So a married Mr. H, who she refused to develop further because of "You can't let go of your family", resolutely chose to give up the family and recognized Joe as her true love, and Ms. H followed (Uma Thurman's performance was a textbook), one because of The mother of three children who broke down after being cheated by Mr. H, took the children to visit the bed where they slept together in front of Mr. H and Joe, and suddenly another friend of Joe (he can only use a friend, not a lover) suddenly. After visiting, say "how many families can you destroy in one night". And Joe just told the kids with a blank face, "I don't love your dad." In the end, Ms. H roared away, and Mr. H and Joe's young gunmates looked at each other, forming a very dark and humorous picture. Joe seems to have to pay for her actions - public opinion should think so, but is it really the family she ruined? Joe is single and pursues his own sexual desire, but the married man gave up his family and chose her. When an original wife finds out that her husband has a mistress, should she beat her mistress or her husband? If a married man consciously does not participate in Joe's activities, and Joe's sex objects are all bachelors, what is Joe's mistake on the premise that the director deliberately avoids STDs?
Of course, it must be clear that Joe is in the minority of the crowd anyway, a sex addict. This is a disease, and it is by no means worthy of praise. Joe shouldn't say "you don't want to give up your family for me" to a married man, this is a guide anyway, one of the reasons why the family fell apart, and caused Ms. H and the children to suffer terrible harm. So she also has self-knowledge, and her evaluation of herself has always been negative. But how did Joe's promiscuity, or being a sex addict, wreak havoc on society? Even though she always wanted to break the rules, in the end, it wasn't the married man's fault, and she didn't even make this mistake - if cheating others' feelings is a felony that is cast aside by society, then many people Both will suffer the gaze of Joe being seen as a sex addict, but is it possible? Sex, no matter what the reason, is Joe's pursuit. Just like some of us are addicted to games and reading books, she is addicted to sex, but why is the whole movie inseparable from the weird eyes on her-because it's different? Or is it just because society is very harsh on sex, especially for women? Is this why she resisted?
What is the meaning of Joe's behavior, what the main theme of the film wants to express, and the rights of men and women, these are not what I pay most attention to when I watch this film. What I'm most concerned about is the person the movie presents to us, Joe, who, despite being too special to be typical, still represents a certain marginalized group.
Sex addicts. My focus is on the sex addicts themselves that the film presents. Sex addiction is already a disease, and addiction to anything is not good. After all, addiction means how much it affects your normal life. But what makes this a sinner? At this time, I want to ask the same question as the old man, "Why do you describe your own behavior as a severe 'sin' in religion?"
As the majority of people in society, it is difficult for you and me to understand a marginalized minority. Whether it's Joe's awakening and his thoughts and behaviors, we think it's absurd and bizarre in our eyes - although most of the men who have sex with her are normal - so we, this society of most people, will Does this question exclude?
Joe later experienced the pain of losing his father, which is exactly what the article mentioned at the beginning of the article, "The heroine was wet on the hospital bed after her father died in the hospital, and the body fluids flowed down her thighs." Joe felt ashamed about this, but that At that time, she could only use this, this almost instinctive reaction to express emotional breakdown. Her sympathy and empathy have been different from ordinary people. After Mrs. H roared and cried away, the old man asked Joe if there was any change, and she said that she didn't feel anything. At this time, she lost some of the abilities of normal people, and she was also called a patient by us, and Joe also felt pain about it. She felt numb, and her senses seemed to serve only the pleasure of the body. When her father was seriously ill, she was too stressed and too emotional. She could only go to the boiler room like a zombie to have sex with the boiler workers. It's her instinctive way of expressing it. At this time, sex has become an integral part of her dependence and it is too difficult for her not to have sex or to think about things related to sex.
She finally surrendered to sex, sexual desire, and completely became something she pursued and satisfied without thinking. This can be described as libido control or addiction. So she began to talk about her lover. The three people mentioned by Joe were finally different from the previously uncharacteristic male sex friends, and began to have meaning to her. She began to devote herself to her sexuality more purely. Finally, under the opportunity that even the old man sighed "too coincidence" but she refuted "my story is clear to me", she met Jerome who had just quarreled with her lover, and she regained the ability to love, this time she was Sex for love, but lost the pleasure of sex. (The first part came to an abrupt end here, but the two can be regarded as one in the first place, entirely because of the length of the cut.) This may be seen as a punishment, or as a microcosm of her misfortune, At all the nodes where she can change the normal people who can become the majority of society, she has been hit, and thus is led to deeper and deeper marginalized areas of the minority.
When Joe finished his narration, the old scholar who was a virgin all his life and devoted himself to the spiritual world would always use blunt but boring popular science to talk vigorously, which made Joe feel like he was hitting the cotton with some strength. It is a realistic and absurd perception that the body is completely devoted to the spirit.
Despite the loss of feelings, Joe still married Jerome and gave birth to a son. It seems that everything is going well. However, for a sex addict, losing sexual pleasure is a devastating thing. Jerome allows her to go to the lover's side. Finding his own pleasure - obviously this is not an easy decision for Jerome, from this decision, perhaps you can see a factor that determines Joe's next life: a person who has become accustomed to jumping out of the rules of society For people who want to achieve integration with normal society, the obstacles are too great. Her sexuality, for the normal Jerome, was an unbearable headache, and despite his sacrifice at the end, it was destined to snowball.
Joe goes to a dangerous man and plays "Oreo" with his two black brothers, but it still doesn't give her much pleasure. All addictions are like this, if you obey, it's a bottomless pit. Perhaps the loss of sexual pleasure for the Jerome she loves is an expansion of this bottomless pit, and the result of Joe's quest will only bring her further from the normal social life she has finally come close to. She finds K. K is serving some ladies in an abandoned office building, playing the sm game of "never have sex with you", the devil is always fascinated, and this fascination is not because of the madness of the devil, but precisely because of the grace that the devil is used to . K slaps Joe's ass violently and relentlessly, but leans over and whispers with extreme tenderness. He tests Joe with his fingers, but he is well-dressed from start to finish. The madness of a gentleman and the tenderness of a pervert are always intoxicating , such a fresh thrill allows Joe to find her new stimulant. So Joe couldn't stop it, and he didn't even have time to take care of his own children.
Joe kept saying to the old man that he was a bad person, although the old man denied her again and again - when a society has a low tolerance for heterogeneity, individuals of the same heterogeneity can give unimaginable tolerance. But as Joe spirals out of control into a sex addiction, she repeatedly makes mistakes as a wife and mother. Responsibility begins to nearly disappear along with empathy. The bottom line of morality began to blur more and more in Joe.
Joe joined a sex addiction support group, but unlike the club years ago that chanted sex first, Joe didn't resonate in this group, she still rejected the definition of being a sex addict, maybe you can see her A strong desire to control desires. She wanted to rely on herself to fight against her strong desires—until this time, she still maintained an independent heart of resistance after being destroyed, but it was the same as when she started to wash her face and slammed her lower body with a damp cloth, even if she obeyed the organization of the mutual aid group. According to the author’s advice, hide everything in the house that may be associated with sex – including exaggerated behaviors such as tying a cushion to the corner of the table, whitewashing the mirror, lying on the almost empty mattress, Joe licking his fingers I still remember sex. At this time, she may also fully understand that sex is something rooted in her brain. She can't leave.
Comedy is difficult to continue, but tragedy has always snowballed. Joe was hired by a debt collector and asked her to use sexual harassment to collect debts. Joe has a talent for this, which also led her to the abyss - she was too far from the basic state of this society. Seeing that Joe is getting older, she needs to find a successor, so she finds the girl P, and almost unsurprisingly, she develops a physical relationship with the girl - even love. But at this time, Joe is too far from morality. Her successor, P, is better than blue. The plot behind has to be said to be too dramatic - just like the coincidence of the old man's lament at the end of the first part, she meets again. To Jerome, but it was good that time, and this time it was tragic. Jerome was their debt collector. After he defeated Joe, P took the initiative to seduce them. The two recreated the top three and bottom five in front of Joe who was lying on the ground, and finally P sprinkled Joe on him. Urine.
This is humiliation. As for the motivation, or it was just that P wanted to be in the top position, so he broke the woman who brought her. For Joe, all this broke her down, but it seemed to be a matter of course. Then, our old scholar came over and found Joe lying on the ground. Joe's life was not a comedy from the very beginning, and later on, after getting married and having children, one after another of tragedies began. The more vulnerable to tragedy, the dark cycle. When Joe needs to take on everything she should take in a normal society, she must say goodbye to the part of herself that is in the minority, otherwise that part will eventually drag her whole into the abyss.
The memory is over, but the plot has ushered in a surprising climax. After Joe fell asleep, the old virgin sligeman, shivering, tried to touch Joe's butt with his bird. Joe was awakened, this "asexual" who let her sleep peacefully after a lot of hardships, this old man who always digressed with hard science tapes that didn't understand the style, now wants to violate her - it was so long before In my sexual experience, I have never even had one. After a few words of argument, the old man said:
You've slept with thousands of men anyway.
They can, why can't I.
So the gun behind the pillow rang.
Black screen, the movie ends. It's an open-ended ending, and the common interpretation is that Joe shot the old man, the one who gave her hope but intensified to destroy everything. But others believe that Joe committed suicide to end an unbearable life.
Either way, it is ultimately tragic. So we can look back at her life with a sympathetic look, saying at some point that she slowly fell into the abyss. Joe is a minority, a complete minority. She even thinks that she is out of tune with the sex addict group. The society and her are in a state of mutual resistance. She rebels against the so-called human nature and some consensus in this society. , although it did not cause any substantial harm at the beginning, it was ultimately unacceptable to this society.
I think the director pays attention to these minorities and gives such a detailed plot, it should not be for a simple discussion of whether it is right or wrong. I have always thought that speculation about the director's intentions is interesting but meaningless, because you are the one watching the movie, and what opinion you have is yours. Editing a five-hour movie just for a "central idea" would be too rigid. The director presents us with a life far away from normal social life. She is a minority, a sex addict, and a rebel. She has tried to obey herself and even rebel against society. She has tried not to care about other people's eyes, and she has also tried to return to normal society. , but after all, she was completely turned into a person far from normal society by the uncontrollable sex addiction-if she could live happily in that kind of life, it would be a good thing, but it was not.
So we don't need to be obsessed with how wrong Joe is, whether society hurt her or her own fault, or even how Joe became a sex addict, these are all part of thinking, but not all. Perhaps you will find that the various moral values and right and wrong of modern society that we have become accustomed to do not work very well with people like Joe, neither for herself nor for us. Just like Joe went out with a group of men when he was single, maybe our accusation against her is "dangerous", and if people don't care about getting sick, or rule out the danger of getting sick, then we can only use a social common sense to say "Indecent and vulgar".
Here's an inappropriate example, games. More than a decade ago, when the game first started, many parents, teachers, and elders in Chinese society thought it was more poisonous than tigers. At that time, could they imagine the e-sports industry where there is even a day and night game training? Of course, game addiction is still harmful, and addiction to games will still bring some negative effects, but society's tolerance for games has obviously changed over time. People who are also good at and addicted to game day and night practice were also a minority a dozen years ago, and they are also not tolerated by this society.
I say inappropriate, because after all, compared to the deep-rooted concept of sexuality and the risks that sexual openness may bring, games are indeed far from balanced on the scale. But has the sensitivity of this society to the topic of sexuality somehow contributed to the formation of minorities like Joe?
I don't dare to talk about the advantages and disadvantages of being conservative and open. Society is an extremely complex system. It has evolved to have dross and essence. It is moving forward slowly in the most stable state, and the emergence of minorities is like a retrograde in a torrent. The fish, the mantis arm when the car finally played is often its own sad song. However, the sad thing is that although I think this society should be inclusive, when we face these minority marginalized people, we will feel that we are being impacted and violated, things that are different from us, many times The choice is to gather the power of everyone and the power of history to destroy it. The difference in life is worthy of awe, and everyone has a completely different growth experience. Since we can’t understand the minority—of course, many times the minority can’t understand us, is it a better way to tolerate than to kill it? I can't give an answer, but I wish I could.
There is a very controversial plot in Female Addict 2 - Joe's own abortion scene is too bloody, it is a very controversial picture, and this is not to be talked about - Joe encounters a pedophile while collecting debts, and his sexual fetish is in the Most people seem to be disgusting and should be punished, but Joe thinks that although he has a tendency to prostitute children, he has always been an honest person, and only dares not to shoot - so Joe thinks that he is not guilty. The social consensus should be that he is guilty, and the tendency will develop sooner or later. At that time, it was not unreasonable to see the comment "I only dare to go to the movies and then go to the movies? Pedophile movies are marketed because of these talents." Therefore, it is actually difficult to define right and wrong. If he has a tendency, is it a sin? If Joe didn't say "give up your family" but was all Mr. H's wishful thinking from beginning to end, then did Joe "break up other people's families"?
This is the biggest contradiction between a few marginalized people and this big society. Their anomalies are so much more obvious than normal people who can hide perfectly, so that they either lose control or choose to obey this anomaly, so they have to face The choice to jump out of society. Although they may not have done any real harm to society until they went into the abyss—for example, Joe finally lost control of his sexuality and ruined his family and marriage—they were on the opposite side. Control and stability are the foundation of this society, and they happen to be missing both.
Another inappropriate analogy is that a genius who is not understood is a lunatic. For the marginalized minority, it is a way to go their own way, but the cost is too high to oppose the rules and consensus of this society. For example, Joe's premature sexual awakening, unhappy family, and father's death are all nodes that change her, and these are beyond her control. The final outcome may be self-inflicted for the out-of-control Joe, but it is definitely a cruel punishment for her once. So for such people, even our empathy begins to contradict, and indifference is neither sympathy nor sympathy—but they should never be disqualified as a human being.
So after watching this kind of movie, it will be very heavy, and I will be full of things crowded together - resulting in a very long span of this article, and the logic behind it is messed up. I would like to thank the director for taking so long to present us with different people. Perhaps for the majority who have always grown up in a normal society, the film is still a little bit more curious, but I also hope to gain insights into the differences in life from it. Reverence and respect; and hope that the future is not destined to belong to the minority in the torrent; finally, I hope that this society will be more inclusive, so that different people can bloom in different environments.
Finally, to all the minorities with "weird" preferences that are different from ordinary people, you have no original sin.
There is no sad song just for you.
View more about Nymphomaniac: Vol. I reviews
