The title of the film is okay, but the second half is a failure. In the second half, a team used to prove that the protagonist child was reincarnated by others to prove the existence of God. In fact, it did not prove anything. It was obviously the thinking logic of religious people, and it was not rigorous. That experiment can only show that people with the same iris characteristics are more likely to be attracted to similar things, or that the attention distribution graphs mostly overlap.
Even if it is proved to be reincarnation, it will not prove the existence of the creator. Perhaps reincarnation is also a mechanism of nature.
In fact, scientists with real scientific spirit in the scientific world never doubt the existence of the Creator, nor do they doubt the non-existence of the Creator. Because there is no way to prove that something does not exist. In that case, why bother trying to prove the existence of the Creator?
View more about I Origins reviews
