Compared with the first part, there is a lot of suspicion of fooling the bureau. Is it the incoherent logic of the screenwriter or the director who made the film look like he was drunk, I really don't know what to say. There are too many flaws in the plot, so let’s just say a few: 1. When Newt had the virus, Teresa said on the radio that Thomas’ blood was the real antidote for the virus, why didn’t Thomas use it directly Blood saves him, even if a dead horse is a living horse doctor. 2. In the end, Thomas read New's letter to him in a sensational scene. Why did he engrave Teresa's name on the stone after reading the letter? It's not good. 3. Teresa clearly had time to jump on the plane, why did she have to die with the building? Did she think about life like a god at that moment? 4. The moment Jensen got the antidote, the virus had already invaded his body. If he didn't inject the antidote first, what would he be doing there, especially with his back to Teresa. 5. Didn't the opposition invade the city to break the existing balance and have an antidote? As for all of them, have they been destroyed, especially the experimental department was bombed, so how to create an antidote to save the infected? 6. In the end, when Thomas has serum in his hand and no equipment, how can he replicate the antidote, and how can he use the antidote on the island he is on? 7. Finally, their group of survivors came to an island, known as a safe haven, but in fact, the virus has not stopped the pace of raging. Where did that peaceful and Genesis-like scene come from so much courage to create it. Okay, let's take these.
As the end of the Maze Runner series, it is indeed a bit sorry for the fans for this kind of business-like misappropriation work.
View more about Maze Runner: The Death Cure reviews
