The short 119 minutes, the simple story background, however, lead to a lot of contradictions. The story itself is a dispute between two children. Two families come together to solve the problem and find a solution that they both agree with. However, because the four people have different views, it becomes a contradiction between men and women, husbands and wives, and heroism and idealism.
The conflict between men and women separates the couples who are originally two camps, and tells that every marriage has its own contradictions. This has nothing to do with class division. The first few times when the guests were leaving, one of them was still fresh in my memory. The host kept the guests when they heard their occupations, perhaps because the guests’ occupations were more advanced, and in layman’s terms they were richer. But this does not mean that the emotional life of the guest family is smooth sailing. Both men don't care about this incident at all, but the man 2 (guest) is more indifferent, he only cares about his mobile phone - his career, while the man 1 is more hypocritical, he bought flowers and still thinks about it There is some food left to entertain guests, but he doesn't care, he just wants to turn big things into trivial things. On the contrary, women care about everything in the family, and they all have their own positions, so it is inevitable that a quarrel will break out, but no middleman will stand up and make a final decision, so in the end, the farce has not stopped, and no final decision has been made. It is decided that this is also the contradiction between women and women in this film. And I think the most important thing about the contradiction between men and women is the lack of communication. Maybe men have already had enough of what women think and do. The unpleasant words that are usually not said at all, the conflict between the husband and wife will never disappear.
In terms of heroism and idealism, I don't know if I understand it right or not, this is how to deal with the problem, or whether it touches my principles when dealing with this problem, I don't think a thing is completely fair and just Treat it, because if it touches your own interests, you can't treat it rationally. But I still have to focus on the overall situation. I apologize for what I did wrong, but if my interests are violated, I have to seek certain benefits for myself. For example, let the one who hit the person apologize. Whether it is sincere or not, we will tell him about this. The truth of things, and then teach children through their own words and deeds will definitely understand. Rather than just being perfunctory - that's what the man in the film thinks.
This also leads to another problem. In the communication between parents and children, the children understand each other through the film at the end. This shows that the two children do not really care about them. They are not as bad as the parents say. For example, the beating party will realize I sincerely apologize for my mistakes, and the party being beaten understands that they should not say such things as informers, and adults are the ones who don't understand them.
The beginning and the end tell us that although the two children quarreled, they only quarreled about one thing, and it was only because of this incident that one boy knocked out the other boy's two front teeth, which was disfigured, but at the end of the film, the two children It's back to good again, the world of children is simple, we only briefly discussed this matter, and adults broke out more quarrels and contradictions because of this matter, and raised this matter to the moral and spiritual level . In my opinion, the beater is wrong after all, and although it is said to be a whistleblower, violence will never solve the problem.
In conclusion, married life requires communication and mutual respect. Everything in this world is reasonable. We can't blame him, but we can restrict it through laws. As for the issue of morality, everyone has a steel scale, and you can do what you think is right. We are married, we are two individuals combined, but we still have our personal space and develop our personal abilities, and the two of us urge and support each other to achieve the best of us. A sentence in the film is right, We come alone, and we will go alone in the end, so give each other some space, respect and understand.
At the same time, at the end, I praised the acting skills of the four actors. They are very good in terms of their lines and performances. They make the audience happy, make the audience interested in watching it, and deeply understand their ideas for each role. I like the character of Nancy very much. She really wants to solve this matter more rationally and is very positive, but everyone has a selfish and emotional side. It's okay to lose her temper after drinking, but I like the way she handles it. .
View more about Carnage reviews
