This is probably one of the most authentic movies I've ever seen.
Viruses are produced in wild monkeys, which are sold underground after poaching, and as a result, the virus spreads among humans.
In the film, the government department first chose an extreme way to deal with this problem, and then blocked the news for various reasons until the problem was too serious to control.
When problems arise, there are always some people who are blind and some who are wise. The protagonist, as a soldier and a doctor, sees the root of the problem, insists on overcoming difficulties to find out the truth, and seeks a way to cure the virus.
In the current period, this movie gives people a somewhat immersive feeling, so it is inevitable to be seated. But this is a movie after all, and the era and national conditions are very different, so we can't dig too much into the details. It's good to think about the enlightenment this 1995 movie has brought us in combination with the current situation.
First, when the Motaba virus first appeared in Africa, people thought it was God's punishment for man's destruction of nature. In reality, when the disease occurs, people also think that it is nature's revenge on human beings. Poaching, deforestation, underground wildlife trade... These are all things that we should reflect on. After all, there are not many dogs that bite people, and there are still many people who eat shit~~
Second, the assistant went from being full of enthusiasm to being scared the first time he was on a mission, and the boss told him that he knew that being scared wasn't a bad thing. This sentence has educational significance for everyone in the society. The current situation is indeed not simple. We cannot be overconfident. Because the country is prosperous and everything is OK, so we have nothing to fear. Wash your hands, reduce crowding" these slogans are ignored and continue to go their own way. You are raising the bar for the country and blindly promoting the self-confidence of a big country. Instead, we must learn to be cautiously afraid. What is prudent is our words and deeds, so that we do not believe in rumors, do not spread rumors, do not spread rumors, and no matter how panicked, we must not talk nonsense, and release the scene of the end of the world in our minds as real-time reports to the society. At the same time, we must also be afraid. What we are afraid of is not the hopelessness of life, but the power of nature and the consequences of misusing human civilization. After all, the disease can be cured, and punishment cannot be avoided. No matter when the problem is solved this time, there will inevitably be sacrifices in the end. I can't say who's sacrifice is innocent, and I can't say who's death is more than innocent, but if the outbreak of the disease is really because of those SBs in the black market who want to give birth to bats, I don't think this sin can't be simply blamed. How many people or which areas? After all, this kind of behavior is not a minority. Since it can be broadcast live on the Internet, it must be tacitly approved by the society. This is not only a matter of personal values, but also a social value ethos The problem. This kind of behavior is a deformed value derived from the corruption of worshipping money and showing off wealth, and it is also the result of contemporary people's pursuit of excitement and freshness. Therefore, the issues we should reflect on are not just our attitudes towards nature and the black market. It is more about the attitude towards social and cultural trends. Who should take care of those unhealthy trends? Is it really just a matter of the cyber police? Or is it a limitation given by the software when sending videos and sending dynamic? Or is it the attitude given by our social and cultural audience?
Third, we must trust the government and the country. In contrast, there are few government officials with selfish motives in similar movies, and solving problems cannot be as extreme as in the movies. As for the blockade of news, there is a lot of public opinion in the society, and I can't say who is right or wrong, but I can analyze the reasons, as discussed on the Internet, if the development of the disease is not serious, why does the government block the city and block the news (This point refers to the fact that relevant network dynamics are not allowed to be posted at the beginning.) Is there something concealed in it? I personally think that this matter is really not a trivial matter. After all, it is an infectious disease. Even if there are only 100 patients diagnosed and quarantined in the hospital, there are no small number of people who have been in contact with them. At this time, the potential problems are relatively large, and timely control is a must. The most efficient and economical way. Second, not overly publicizing the seriousness of the problem is also for the sake of social order, because the proportion of "intellectuals" who really have a grasp of the data is still a minority in the society, and most people's concept of the development of the problem comes from Internet propaganda, those are all things expressed by the author of the article, its authenticity is affected by subjective consciousness, and the accuracy needs to be studied. Some authors who do not fully understand the problem may also publish articles because of their personal emotions Point to with wrong information. These are likely to cause panic among the masses, as well as social unrest, and even become an opportunity for some lawbreakers to profit from it. Therefore, we must learn to think for ourselves, not to be too extreme, to trust the government, not to believe in rumors, not to spread rumors, and not to spread rumors. After all, the macroscopic force of government regulation and control is the key method to solve the problem. At least I expect everyone to think about one thing when reading online information, those who promote negative emotions, can they solve the problem, and if not, what are their motivations?
Fourth, no matter when and where, we should thank the front-line doctors, nurses, soldiers and the masses who actively responded to the call and supported the disaster relief. Especially those angels in white, they paid too much. I'm a college student now, but when things happen, I can still think of the article I learned in elementary school, an article describing the doctors and nurses who fought against SARS in 2003 - "Angel in White". I admit that it is really hard for me to remember the specific content, but I know that I was only four years old when the SARS epidemic hadn’t been there. If it wasn’t for those angels who sacrificed their lives to protect us, it would have been difficult for our post-90s generation to reach today. Many of the people who are entering the battle today are born in the 90s. Although I am not a descendant of the medical field, I am proud of these peers. They inherited the spirit of their predecessors and showed the blood and courage of our generation. . Finally, I express my sincere respect to the protagonists in the movie with their lines: People are dying. It's about you being a doctor! It's about that sacred oath we took!
Fifth, "Xiaotangshan" NB, big building NB, seniors NB!
Come on Wuhan, come on China!
View more about Outbreak reviews
