human torture

Dimitri 2022-04-20 09:01:40

I read a report a few days ago, probably saying that there is a chicken farm in France, because the meat quality of the rooster is not as good as that of the hen, so the young rooster will be killed by crushing and suffocating when it is just hatched.
Since then, the humaneness of economic animals has officially moved to the desks of parliamentarians.
In the bloodthirsty dawn, humans are undoubtedly an economic animal to vampires. Vampires hunt and feed them. But maybe because of the negligence of the managers, they did not find a better way to make human beings multiply and expand the number of ethnic groups during the ten 35th birthdays spent by the male protagonist, so they fell into famine (why is negligence because in reality In life, you never have to worry about a day without pigs, cattle, sheep and chicken. Humans are very good at raising economic animals.).
The question then arises, whether humane treatment of economic animals is necessary.
The issue could spark criticism from dog lovers and some operators and consumers of dog meat restaurants.
It's an eternal problem.
Of course, after watching the movie, I still have some doubts about this question. The male protagonist is a staunch defender of humanitarianism. He has never drank a drop of human blood in his ten-year vampire career, even if he is no longer human. The male protagonist's younger brother is different. It's not enough to become a vampire first, and he has to drag his brother (because he can't bear the pain of losing his brother, hehe), and he said "cure" to his brother before he accidentally turned back into a human being. Disdainful attitude.
First of all, let’s explore the reasons why the two brothers have completely different ways of thinking about being born and raised by the same mother. First of all, according to the younger brother’s self-reported, he was powerless when he was a human, and “never was good at being a human being.” Unsatisfactory life is everywhere, and it is very likely that the human beings who are his companions are causing his unhappiness. Therefore, when he was a human, he had no sense of belonging to the identity of a human at all, and naturally he turned to vampires wholeheartedly.
The elder brother is different. The male protagonist has an elite appearance and is engaged in the research and development of blood substitutes. He must be an elite in the industry before he becomes a vampire (while the younger brother can only rely on the brute force of a man to be a soldier to hunt "wild" Humanity). Therefore, the male protagonist must not see his brother's discomfort with human identity before becoming a vampire. The gardener will come to attack himself, and he doesn’t believe that his subordinates will call the police, so he is betrayed by them without the slightest defense). Therefore, it is also natural to stand on the humanitarian side.
I can't say which is better or worse. After all, vampires don't have as many choices as us humans in their recipes. Human blood is about survival. (Although the male protagonist did not touch a drop of human blood, he may have been relying on animal blood to survive, but the male protagonist has a sign of degeneration even though it is slow--pointed ears.) Of course, this is before the invention of blood substitutes. .
But the male protagonist still has the white lotus thought of "Vampires are morbid". After learning the news, he still deliberately annoyed the president, made a trick to turn him back into a human, and used him as bait to put him in the elevator to attract artillery fire. Of course he knew the end. The vampires sucked the boss's blood and turned back into humans. But the male protagonist thinks that this is a kind of redemption in the "perverted" world. Of course, the boss's capitalist face is hateful enough, and it does not rule out the possibility that the male protagonist will lose his mind and simply want revenge.
In the end, the hero's act of salvation did defeat the vampire army, but he also caught up with a pure, lovely, innocent and kind younger brother.
The ending does not clearly point out the direction of the world, but the transformation of the male protagonist must be a boost for humans - in the future, turning vampires back into human blood and filling them with ammunition is a sure win (anyway, vampires never face humans. It's anesthesia, don't worry about accidental lunch).
But I still hope that the male protagonist can maintain a kindness to his former vampires - I think there must be many vampires who are more willing to remain vampires because of illness, and with blood replacement products, survival will not be a problem.
Of course, those who insist on pursuing "there is something in human blood that is not in blood substitutes. Fear." Such hypocritical people, in the case of threatening the existence of human beings, as a human being I think it is better to be shot down. .

View more about Daybreakers reviews

Extended Reading
  • Ludie 2022-04-23 07:01:49

    Thoughtful horror series. I was so mad that I didn't even bother to watch it on Tencent Video. After watching it, I edited it for at least 16 minutes! #SARFT nmsl#

  • Kayli 2021-11-20 08:01:27

    OMG, I was scared to death. It’s actually pretty good to watch this movie boldly. The subject matter is very good and the visual impact is too great. I can’t stand it. The trailer doesn’t show such violent blood. I regret watching this movie, not because of the movie itself (except for some scenes). (Somewhat nauseous), I was cowardly, I came out with my heart. I'm cute, the male lead brother, he looks handsome when he wears a hat.

Daybreakers quotes

  • [last lines]

    Edward Dalton: [voiceover] We have a cure. We can change you back. It's not too late.

  • Audrey Bennett: That thing could kill you!

    Edward Dalton: I'm already dead.