What I see is this, Aunt May's approach is admirable, although she is too confident to say ''experience'', ''I know people'', and even she used trickery, because the people in it know , There is no shortage of people in the world who know, but evidence is lacking.
The logic chain is clear, the priest secretly put a piece of underwear in the little black child's cabinet, and gave the little black child a gift that only a little girl would play with. After meeting the little black child alone, the little black child was very emotional and just wanted to go home For the first time), the benefit of helping the little black boy, the little black boy was discriminated against and beaten by his father because of his relationship with a man, (he was tempted or forced, straight to bend or born to bend or only to bend afterwards The question is only discussed), the little black child's mother even wanted to leave things alone and go to a famous school, and also suspected that the little black child was gay by nature. He said that he had made a phone call to ask the past, that the priest chose to resign, which fully shows that there is a reasonable doubt, not a culpable guilt.
Why not turn it upside down? In the film, Aunt May is obviously fearless in the face of the priest, and she is even quick to get rid of it. Why can't we get rid of evil? I think this is doubt too. Can the little black child and his mother be witnesses, whether the little black child is willing or not, can the little black child's father accept and face it calmly? Undoubtedly, this is a big earthquake for this black family, and it is not fair to the little black child from a privacy point of view, whether he is a 100% victim or not. What a fucking doubt!
The priest went to a new parish and got a promotion, ''dogs can't change to eat shit'', I don't know who the next victim is, FUCK! Really fuck doubt! The strong, resolute, and meaningless Aunt Mei finally shed helpless tears.
There is nothing new under the sun!
View more about Doubt reviews
