The main thing I want to do is to play duo. You see, the scene of confrontation between two guns appeared twice in this movie. How can I not hold back?
But the problem is that the mainstream old beauty of the year (now everyone is a spiritual gay, this is different) may not be like you falling in love and killing each other, so I am awkward to add drama to the heroine, and make it very de-genderized. . Except for the setting of having a close girlfriend, you can hardly see the role of a woman. Amnestics itself is one of the two big gimmicks in this film. I can't remember you but you love me so much. It's still a bit messy. Just take a Sansong portable DVD to solve it and it's sprayed. What’s even more sprayed is that there is a very few emotional scenes in the whole film. The heroine is lovingly confessing to the actor, "the sweet gold between us is not exchanged", this big book is actually thinking about her own 20 How to use each item. I'm a female. I slapped you and slapped you. It's not that you can't advance the plot, or that you have to be tired of talking about love for a while in each film, but you don't understand Chinese, do you know what timing is. The last HE was even more happy for me. What do you mean by forcibly paying tribute to all over the world?
Then I said how unsuitable this book itself is. It's not that he is not good, but he is really only suitable for pure gunfights, ping-pong, pong-pong-pong, fireworks, brotherhood, sympathy, and concave shape. Etc., etc.
And this kind of book that requires a little brain and wants to convey some ideas, he has too little room to play. So that the long road chases and fan action scenes that are not necessary at all need to be half of the movie. It feels like the first half of his body is burning with anger, and all he thinks in his heart is when will my fucking take pictures and start doing it, I'm going to desperately let go and do it happily.
Originally a very profound theme, about mastering the future is a blessing or a curse, and then you can also extend it to whether some seemingly bright redemption technology is a blessing or a curse. Give some big shots who are good at science fiction subjects to ensure that the connotation will burst. The teacher took a photo like a big bouncing bean and read 6 points of modern text reading standard answer: predicting the future will infect us like a plague and let us lose the ability to control our lives.
But when it comes to this standard answer, it is not clear at all. From a plot point of view, the act of "foreseeing the future" itself is that the plague god will eventually lead to the end. The actor also said that my primary goal was to destroy the machine, but when I got to the scene, I had to repair the machine with its own bug buried in it first, and then destroy it after looking at it. This caused a lot of complications. Someone wants to say, you idiot, can't this movie be so long? It's you who want to make time. You want to create drama conflicts, but you have to give a reasonable explanation for making time. Otherwise, you should also emphasize it first, knowing how the future is as fatal and tempting as a sweet death to the protagonist.
After all, the film is not enough to render fatalism. The actor originally used some life props and his own ingenuity to easily rewrite the future. Why does he value his last moment so much that he has to fix the machine and watch it again? The villain is also very upright, and I have to feel that I can only throw you into the scene where you are predicted to die in the future, otherwise you can't die. I'm stupid again, the bad guys are not stupid and can he finally he? But in fact, I hope that the bad guy will die because he talks a lot instead of being upright. After all, this adds some cute qualities to the bad guy.
In fact, it was after watching a Taiwanese teacher's open class on science fiction that I thought of looking for this film which is not so well-recognized. A seemingly beautiful idea often hides many problems behind it, and even one of the seemingly irrelevant small problems will cause big troubles. Many sci-fi works are based on this. It reminds me of the hardcore SF "Mirror" by Liu Cixin, who is a little bit conflicted with this film. It’s quite interesting that Mr. Liu’s hard-line SF often follows this line of thinking: 1. A beautiful new world-style idea is born 2. This idea has many problems, some of which are even cruel-so far it is quite common, but Next-3. Although there are so many cruel problems with the emergence of this concept, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages (or at a certain point in time the advantages outweigh the disadvantages), and the final result is often adopted.
View more about Paycheck reviews
