Regarding the fate of this drama, I think the screenwriter did not write this drama as sci-fi. I personally think it is a pseudo-sci-fi with mythology. First of all, there are "gods" and "angels" in the universe. However, "Gods" cannot interfere too much with the various human (or non-Protoss) species. Therefore, human beings have experienced countless cycles of survival and destruction. After the destruction, "Gods" created mankind again, and mankind once again stepped into extinction, so " "Galactica" is actually a play where "God" indirectly interferes with mankind. "God" uses the hands of three "angels" to avoid the complete destruction of mankind. These three angels are "Starbucks", "No. 6" and "Doctor". In the early stage, the "Starbucks" was a human being, and the angel who was resurrected later was an angel. However, this angel did not know that he was an angel, but only knew that he had a mission.
Regarding Cylon, I don’t think I can understand how good inorganic life is. It can do a lot of things that organic life can’t do. Why do human beings create infinite life, and these inorganic life are going to create organic life? Could it be that organic life was created just to eliminate mankind? Inorganic life can survive on any planet without oxygen. It only needs energy. Organic life has too many restrictions. It needs oxygen, needs food, needs maintenance of organs, and maintenance is also very troublesome. Inorganic life is the part Which component is broken, it’s easy to repair, it doesn’t need oxygen, and the life cycle is long. How good is it? It’s not necessarily called continuation of life to give birth to the next generation. In fact, Cylon’s resurrection technology is also a kind of continuation of life. ?
View more about Battlestar Galactica reviews
