Some people think that John Kramer's logic is absurd, and some people think that it is actually so thought-provoking and reasonable. But even if his logic is correct, should he kill people? If his logic is correct, why shouldn't he kill? It is to judge the life and death of others, and he has no right to judge the life and death of others. "No one has the right to decide the life and death of others, no matter how heinous that person is." Just like Cramer's reason for arresting the insurance company's boss William Easton, Clay acquiesced: Easton’s fault was that he used himself. The values judge and determine the life and death of others. But isn't Kramer himself the same? He is always judging and deciding the life and death of others. (It's just that he and Easton are based on different logic and standards .)
So, whose standard is right? Why?
What standard is right? Who decides what is the right standard? If Clay tacitly assumes that his standards are correct, Easton should be punished. Easton made bad choices time and time again, so Easton should die.
So was it different when Easton decided the lives and deaths of other people? Easton also believes that his logic and standards are correct-rejecting insurance in accordance with the policy. It is a dangerous concept to think that you are right/just, and that others are wrong/low/evil should not exist.
When Hitler slaughtered the Jews, he felt that he was purging the world and eliminating people who should not exist; the terrorists felt that his actions were a great and glorious "jihad." When the culture/hua/da/revolution/fate collapsed, they also felt that they were eradicating things that shouldn't exist. Everyone who has done so bad things in this world thinks they are "right". When does terrorism think that they are right, they are doing great and glorious things?
"Justice" makes me feel terrible and awe-inspiring.
I can't refute whether Kramer's logic and standards are correct or not, because this is something I didn't want to understand: what are the standards of right and wrong, and what are the standards of good and evil.
So I thought, no matter what other people do, how immoral, or how bad a person is, Kramer should not be judged by Kramer that he deserves to live or die. As for who should judge, I don't know, but it's not Kramer. It’s not someone who thinks he’s right and wants to use his own values to determine the world. I hate the word "walking for the sky". Relying on the law or karma to punish some bad people may not be a reliable logic. However, human beings have used their own thousands of years of history to find the law, and the law should be the least bad way. It is definitely not an individual who goes to "walk for the sky". No one has the qualifications to act for the heavens. As far as I know, those who think they are acting for the heavens seem to be doing judging and hurting others without authorization.
--------------------------- This long film review just wants to express one sentence: No one has the right to decide the life and death of others, no matter that How wicked people are. No one has the right to decide the life or death of any one person. Even others.
We must understand that we are not qualified to judge and decide. No wonder American dramas often say No judge.
(My values are quite negative. I don’t want to take the responsibility of changing the world. I feel that most people’s self-righteous changes are making the world worse, so I respect the free development of it. Very negative.
-------------------------------------------------- -------
As for the things I didn't want to understand: what are the standards of right and wrong, and what are the standards of good and evil.
Therefore, I can only regard others as mistakes as little as possible, and less self-righteous; try to respect differences and the existence of others.
The standard of good and evil is to be as good as possible. The boundary of freedom is not to harm the interests of others.
----------------------Updated in 2017------------------------- ------------------------
Regarding why the terrorists feel that their suicide attack is a holy war↓↓,
It can only be said that the Middle East was originally a glass ball with cracks.
In the last century, we have all played our part, and we have completely shattered it.
And now, each of us may be cut on the soles of our feet by the shards of glass all over the floor.
https://www.zhihu.com/question/26396888/answer/43702896
View more about Saw VI reviews
