-------------------------------------------------- --------Ideal is also flesh-------------------------------------- --------------------- "Sin Night Run" does not have too much anger when it talks about justice, it is not even evil, but shows struggle and resignedly. Why are judicial results wrong? Why are there injustices? Whenever we hear that an unjust case is exposed, we naturally question such questions. It’s as if we hear which hospital misdiagnosed a patient, and we can’t help but wonder why this happened. We should naturally question that these voices constitute a social force to monitor and promote improvement. However, even if all the mistakes made by malicious manipulation and dereliction of duty are removed, even if all that remain are experienced and professional police officers, prosecutors, judges, lawyers, doctors and nurses, our judicial and medical departments will still make mistakes. of. The film includes representatives of three aspects of the modern judicial system: police officers, prosecutors and lawyers. The police officer BOX in the film, he should take the slack and carefully investigate all suspicious objects like Detective Conan; the female prosecutor in the film, she should resist the pressure of the three bosses above and insist on bringing the case to court for prosecution. defense; the lawyers in the film should have pleaded not guilty to Naz's innocence free of charge and accept no compromise of any kind. These characters, they are all experienced and professional, but even they can't meet these ideal requirements, because justice requires costs. Investigation requires cost, proof requires cost, trial requires cost, defense requires cost, and these people are just ordinary office workers. The eczema lawyer's business card reads "no penny until free", which is practiced in his regular practice, and in the film he does receive payment after the client is released. But for complex criminal cases like the protagonist Naz, the human, financial and time costs required are beyond what he can advance. Even the female lawyer who has already run a large law firm is only willing to provide pro bono services until she agrees to plead guilty, no matter what her original intentions are, whether she believes in Naz's innocence or not, all she can give is money. Applicability help. Those who practise sacred occupations are not fundamentally different in their genetic makeup from those who practise all other occupations. They also get paid according to their work, they also have performance goals, and they don't like to work overtime, They are also under pressure from leadership. We'd be like the two cops hoping to get off work four hours earlier, and like the female prosecutor who'd like to take off our high heels for a pair of sneakers and go home after a day's work. What is causing our legal practitioners to selectively ignore details in order to prioritize results? If a laundryman has a mountain of clothes at his feet, you can't expect him to check out every stain on every piece of clothing. This has nothing to do with the sense of responsibility and justice. If the general environment is not improved, then things can only be dealt with transactionally. How much resources can we spend on a person or a case? This is the difficult decision we face on the road to justice. -------------------------------------------------- --------It is best not to use insurance money----------------------------------- ------------------ The fist of justice will also hit the wrong person, which is unavoidable objectively, just like Apple's production line will also have product quality problems, still After-sales department is needed to do post-service. To this end, the defense and jury system was created to help correct some of the mistakes. In the process of error correction, new errors will also arise, and the wrong ones may be corrected, or the original right ones may be denied. At this point, the modern judicial system tends to suspect the existence of guilt, but there are also people who hold Different points of view, like the one who poured boiling water on Naz, depending on where he stood on the issue. "Sin Night Run" Standing on the side of suspicion and guilt, but it also raises a deeper question: after you have wronged a person, is the innocence you give him back his original innocence? Returning with freedom is a man with no secrets that has been parsed from the inside out. He lost his secrets, he lost his mother's trust, he lost his friends, he lost his original world. The trial ended and he was free, but when he returned to his old life, everyone except his father saw him differently. If it wasn't for being pushed to such a position, where one party strongly asserts his guilt and the other party vigorously defends his innocence, then no one should be willing to be observed and studied under a magnifying glass and a perspective lens. No one is perfect, and everyone lives between black and white. No one has ever lied, no one has a hidden side, no one has a secret they don't want to tell their parents, and no one has played tricks behind their backs. Not everything in life is both black and white. There are some things that no one wants to pierce that layer of paper, and not many people are ready for this unpleasant but real side. Even speaking, human beings themselves are walking on the edge of civilization and the jungle. Human nature is neither good nor evil, neither good nor evil. What is considered evil in civilization may only be the law of survival in the jungle. Humans have spent thousands of years educating civilizations, and is our judicial process helping the marginalized out of the jungle, or is it pushing them into the jungle? The essence of the judiciary is to convict people, not to give them redemption, so those who hold the power of law enforcement in their hands should be more in awe of the decisions they are about to make. Thank you for the right of defense that the modern litigation system gives me, it's like a civil insurance, it will come into play when it matters, but if I'm innocent, I hope I never need to use this right, I hope I never need to Prove why you're a good person like you would at a poker table when it's dark.
View more about The Night Of reviews
