If you examine this film with navigational knowledge, you will see a lot of loopholes. For example, the ship was driven by wind without starting the engine at the beginning. For example, if you didn’t untie the rope after jumping on the life raft, it was completely possible that it sank with the ship, such as using water. After cleaning up the radio, I found that the radio was not working well, why did I repair the antenna and so on?
I'm not saying that there is something wrong with picking, everyone can have their own entry position when watching a movie. What I want to say is that if the audience can also be classified, then these provocative friends should belong to critical realism, right? If you think like you, you shouldn’t finish watching this film. First of all, if you shave before the storm, you have a brain disease, right? In the same way, if you read The Matrix, you must explain to you that if robots dominate the world, in fact, machine language should be used. After you read Xiao Shengke’s salvation, you must discuss whether the spoon is durable enough to support digging a complete tunnel. .....
I think you should watch the news network more and give them opinions, or at least write a film review for the founding of the party and explain to everyone that it was not the case at that time. Show other films to you, just like a pretty good girl, the posture of entering is wrong, you can't taste it, you have to spend time to spray, I feel sorry for your time and the film itself.
In short, I think some people think this is a very interesting movie, and the things to be said have little to do with navigation itself. This movie should also be filmed for these people. For other people who feel that the information given by the director will affect their sailing career by mistake, I send you a sentence: Some people feel the rain. Others just get wet.
View more about All Is Lost reviews
