But this movie is "based on a true story" in big print... What does it mean to have Daniel Craig play a Jew, director? ! Do you really want to convince me, or do you want to force me to complain, or do you want to express that the protagonist of the original story is also a mutated Jew? I can't say how many Jews I've seen, but here it has a place called Ville de juif, and the mixed breed has a wide range, but I've never seen a Jew who looks so Slavic, and it's even better The Slavic's younger brother has Jewish physical features - I really can't find any other explanation other than genetic variation.
Well, even Tuvia in history is a rare case of genetic mutation like Coleman in "The Stain of Humanity" (of course, based on the pictures of the characters released at the end of the film, this is no doubt a complete false proposition), but since he has He grew up like this, even if he ran naked on the streets of Germany and slammed into Hitler's arms, Lao Xi couldn't tell that he was Jewish, and the best ethnologists in the world at that time couldn't find out from his appearance. Any Jewish traces of it. Then what is he hiding, what is he hiding?
If D.Craig's acting skills are so amazing, or this film has extra muscle-exposing scenes (that's what I thought from the beginning), in short, this film is not impossible for Yi Lai to act, then at least you go too, Daniel Dyeing your hair, this professional requirement is not too much. Besides, looking at the whole film, I can't find the slightest reason to ask Craig to pretend to be a Jewish leader. So I don't understand what Edward Zwick's intention is to put such a blond Jew in a movie that is supposed to be "based on true events" in response to the audience's viewing habits? ! Could it be that Zwick is actually a blond (possibly uh, Pi and Leo are also blond). Still want to test to see if the storyline and background portrayal are realistic enough to give the audience the appearance of the 54 male protagonist... Seriously, is there no protest against the Jewish organization in the United States for this character?
Zwick is best at shooting landscapes and sensationalism. This time, he has both hands and both hands are very hard. Especially the brotherhood between Tuvia and Zus (I still have a hard time accepting that they are biological brothers, and had to hypnotize myself along the way to say "Tuvia was picked, picked, picked"), if it weren't for the two Limited by the appearance, I almost have to YY for a period of time and years. But I don't know why. Although Zwick's shoes are a bearded man, he seems to be more suitable for shooting background works written by female writers. There is always a kind of "too much for performance, so people don't like it". unnatural.
In terms of family affection, "No matter how many differences there are, we are a family after all at the juncture of life and death". We can understand and appreciate this kind of feeling that blood is thicker than water. Even if there is no chance to shoot at brothers, there will always be cousins and sisters who can. It is a tangle that those who meet when they meet are quarreling and fighting, and who are reluctant to miss when they part.
As for human nature, after all, we are people who have never experienced bloody storms. Don’t say that our lives are on the line, and the four words “hunger and cold” are often imagined out of thin air, so people living in peaceful times are actually nothing. Qualified to stand on the moral high ground to criticize those who strive to survive.
I hummed when Tuvia rode on a white horse and said in a saintly manner, "We must never become animals, even if we were to die, we had to die like humans."
Death is death, whether it is life or death, or accidental death, people will die like this, and animals will die like this. Probably, except for world-weary suicide, which is a way of death specially created by people, other methods of death are not comparable. divide it. And war... is the behavior of animals, no matter what the banner of war is, the ultimate goal is to fight for the living space and power, "grabbing money, grain and women" is just that humans use guns as teeth to bite each other just the throat. Both perpetrators and victims in war are beasts.
Once stripped of its place in society, all that remains is the animal's instincts. Only animals would still want to emphasize and establish their special status in this kind of environment, even if it was just for a bowl of potato soup, only animals would be in such a situation that they could not save themselves, regardless of what the next generation might have to endure. The suffering of the animal only regards reproduction as the reason for its own existence, and only animals do not hesitate to harm their fellows for their own food.
Therefore, in the midst of war, trying to maintain the ethics formed by human beings in normal society seems to me to be boring and futile. On this point, I stand on Zus's side - now that I have become the prey, since I have made it clear what I want to do The object to be protected, as long as it is fast, economical and economical, to win the victory on your side is the least harmful and the most in line with the will of nature.
Perhaps at the beginning of the war Tuvia was still thinking too much about war, or maybe it was the guilt over the killings his parents committed in revenge that made him want to atone. But when disobedience to the order endangered the stability of the group under his protection, he directly killed the other party without a fair trial and without cherishing life, just like a lion jumping up and killing other male lions trying to invade his territory . There was no court-martial and no preferential treatment of the prisoners when the crowd rushed towards the captured German soldiers, and Tuvia did not stop because he could not stop a group of beasts that wanted to tear the enemy to shreds.
Fortunately, this is "adapted from a true story". If it is a story we imagined, can Zwick resist not beautifying the hero in the story, not sympathizing with the victims in the story, and not whitewashing the animals who turned into animals? What about humans?
In fact, what attracted me the most in the whole film was not the male lead nor the supporting actor, but Uncle Beard and Uncle Glasses. These two would discuss philosophy and politics when sawing wood, so that Zus said "You can kill me, just" with your talks", he would play chess when the three meals were not good, and he was also one of the few people who looked sideways and said they couldn't bear it when the crowd beat up the German prisoners. It was too funny. Especially Uncle Beard, he likes uncle TX glasses "You annoy me, so I exist", LOL...
When Uncle Beard was about to die, he told Tuvia: I nearly lost my faith. But God sent you to save us. ( To the effect)
Tuvia: It's ridiculous.
Uncle Beard: I know. Just in case. I thank HIM and I thank you.
This is probably one of the best last words I've ever heard.
Moses parted the Red Sea, maybe it was just the movement of the earth's crust. Tuvia led the crowd through the swamp, perhaps only because of Asael's persistence and cleverness. But, just in case, when the environment forces us to become animals, we can also believe in more romantic and magical arguments, so that there will be no more advanced ways of dying animals - of course, but will die calmly and gratefully Yes, maybe it's really only humans.
PS: In fact, I don't care about what color Tuvia's hair is after I vomit. It is the next 007. I sincerely hope that I can change to a black-haired one... Watching inertia is a terrible thing.
View more about Defiance reviews
