See also Spielberg - The Washington Post
The film is as neat as a textbook. Tom Hanks/Mel Streep reinterprets the value of freedom from news and speech events
Why do I have to say a few more words here---just because the film was introduced one day without the guts. The film is so normal that it can't be normal anymore: there are no bloody scenes, no deliberate sensationalism, and no eye-catching pictures. But it doesn't affect its huge explosive force
For the Chinese people who are keen on palace fighting, it once again sounded the alarm bell of values.
Freedom - The one that truly protects people's freedom is still the First Amendment to the (US) Constitution. A certain speech, a certain spirit, and a certain intention cannot bring security and protection. Even a layman like me fully understands how important this First Amendment is.
The story of the film is not made up, and the real lawsuit is also a classic case. The result was the Supreme Court of the United States. In the end, the nine justices voted 6-3 to win (constitutional victory).
The Justice's Statement: The Founding Father's system of protection for media freedom was designed to give full play to the role of the media in protecting democracies.
Justice's statement: The media should serve the governed, not the rulers. "
Publisher Statement: The only way to defend the right to publish is to publish.
Public Statement: Is it treason to destroy the reputation of a dang government or an individual? ! This does not mean to say: I am the country! "
... I don't know when these words can appear in the official publications of the Celestial Dynasty?
View more about The Post reviews