The rule of law is the rule of law

Sigrid 2022-04-21 09:02:03

See also Spielberg - The Washington Post

The film is as neat as a textbook. Tom Hanks/Mel Streep reinterprets the value of freedom from news and speech events

Why do I have to say a few more words here---just because the film was introduced one day without the guts. The film is so normal that it can't be normal anymore: there are no bloody scenes, no deliberate sensationalism, and no eye-catching pictures. But it doesn't affect its huge explosive force

For the Chinese people who are keen on palace fighting, it once again sounded the alarm bell of values.

Freedom - The one that truly protects people's freedom is still the First Amendment to the (US) Constitution. A certain speech, a certain spirit, and a certain intention cannot bring security and protection. Even a layman like me fully understands how important this First Amendment is.

The story of the film is not made up, and the real lawsuit is also a classic case. The result was the Supreme Court of the United States. In the end, the nine justices voted 6-3 to win (constitutional victory).

The Justice's Statement: The Founding Father's system of protection for media freedom was designed to give full play to the role of the media in protecting democracies.

Justice's statement: The media should serve the governed, not the rulers. "

Publisher Statement: The only way to defend the right to publish is to publish.

Public Statement: Is it treason to destroy the reputation of a dang government or an individual? ! This does not mean to say: I am the country! "

... I don't know when these words can appear in the official publications of the Celestial Dynasty?

View more about The Post reviews

Extended Reading
  • Brenda 2022-03-28 09:01:03

    Although this is just a very neat and typical American theme movie aimed at winning the award, as a movie itself, there is nothing outstanding, but it still makes me want to cry. . . Because in that era, news could be worth every word and change the direction of the era. In that era, there were countless Americans who could put aside their left and right positions and stand up against the country purely to defend the freedom of the press and to prevent the abuse of power. machine. So in that era, no matter how violent and unscrupulous Nixon was, he could still be defeated by the joint efforts of countless famous and unknown warriors. . . Today, although there are still such journalists in the United States, there are still brave men who dare to stand up in front of Congress to accuse the abuse of power, and there are still whistleblowers who are willing to take risks in order to defend democracy, but times have changed. Social media, political propaganda, and the populist frenzy have made everything that once saved America irrelevant. This is the best era for the strong,

  • Herta 2022-03-24 09:01:49

    Shooting neat historical movies, the old directors and actors are all up to the standard. It is a pity that it lacks some new ideas, and the event process is still more than the excavation of characters and ideas.

The Post quotes

  • Meg Greenfield: ...from the majority opinion: 'In the First Amendment the Founding Fathers gave the free press the protection it must have to fulfill its essential role in our democracy. The press was to serve the governed, not the governors.'

  • Kay Graham: My decision stands, and I'm going to bed.